Talk:Christine Anderson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Red: Parliamentarians (2019)

This article was created or improved during the Parliamentarians edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in December 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Nonsense guilty by association smear

Look, lots of politicians have their picture taken with other politicians. This is normal. It does not mean that they support of even like the people they meet with. Trudeau has had his picture taken with Putin. Does that make him a Putin supporter? Trump has had his picture taken with the dictator of North Korea. Does that make him a communist? Doug Ford has had his picture taken with Trudeau. Does that make them besties? This is clearly not of Encyclopedic value whatsoever. This German politician has surely had her picture taken with thousands of people. Should we list them all? What sheer and utter nonsense is this? 208.98.222.112 (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't attempt to convince people of an opinion. It is simple a notable event regarding this person, and is worth mentioning. Ilovecats516 (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we could come to some kind of middle ground by reducing that paragraph to a single sentence? I'm unsure about the notability of this "controversy" and whether it truly exists or not, googling "Chrstine Anderson Controversy" only has one or two sources about this- As well as this, the event is still very very recent; if it becomes more significant and notable as time goes on, it makes sense to include it, but at the moment I don't really think it does deserve the entire paragraph.tla 02:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost Totally Gaslighting

This article appears to be recently edited to only project some Canadian based SJW agenda. There is minimal pertinent and factual information, and maximal gaslighting. Altogether, it seriously degrades Wiki credibility.

187.143.54.13 (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC) baden k.[reply]

Normal people view Anderson as a defender of human rights and freedoms. 2001:569:F947:4B00:8DD5:7CE7:E24B:E02A (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Telling the world that COVID-19 was created and used as a test to see how compliant people would be, is not rational, nor true in any way. It's this kind of psychobabble that has gotten millions killed in the last few years. Those who speak like her are the ones dying and causing others to die. No one has the right to wilfully spread deadly diseases because they think wearing masks or getting vaccines are a method to control the masses. Measles is coming back, and polio will be next, if people don't grow up and stop believing in ignorant conspiracies more than they value lives. 104.243.181.224 (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]