Talk:Christchurch railway station (Ireland)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:DART Underground map. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Christchurch railway station, Dublin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923233924/http://www.thejournal.ie/government-cancels-metro-north-and-dart-underground-plans-200225-Aug2011/ to http://www.thejournal.ie/government-cancels-metro-north-and-dart-underground-plans-200225-Aug2011/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150303205110/https://www.irishrail.ie:80/about-us/dart-underground to http://www.irishrail.ie/about-us/dart-underground
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
CRYSTAL / MERGE
[edit]Even after an attempted clean-up recently, the level of "dream within a dream" speculation here makes Nolan's Inception (or indeed Heller's Catch-22) seem like an Ann and Barry story. Essentially what this article seems to be saying is that, if the DART Underground is built (sometime, at a best estimate, after 2030), an underground station could/maybe/might be built at Christchurch. Otherwise, if the Luas Line F is built (also some time in the nebulous future), a Luas stop may be opened at Christchurch. Both speculations are seemingly mutually exclusive. (As, if the DART Underground is built, Luas line F (if that is built) will terminate 3 miles away at Inchicore). In any event, unless there are other thoughts, I am going to simplify and merge this content into the DART Underground article (possibly in a "proposed stations") section. And redirect this title. I see no value in an article which changes with every new puff of wind (and is, at once, always out-of-date and always speculative). The only value of such a title is as an example of why we have WP:CRYSTAL guidelines.... Guliolopez (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- As I haven't heard anything back on the above, and unless there are other thoughts, I am proposing to merge the (limited) amount of non-crystal content that is here to the DART Underground#Proposed stations section. And redirecting this title to that section. Per WP:MERGEREASON (In that there is significant overlap in text and context with that article. "If the DART underground is built sometime in the next 20/30 years, then there might be a station on that line serving Christchurch" - if/might/maybe/could-be). Guliolopez (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Resolved It has been several weeks since I opened this thread, and a further week since I added the merge/redirect hatnote. As I haven't heard anything to the contrary, I've gone ahead with the merge/redirect proposal. If this station is ever built, then the title can be returned to a standalone article. Otherwise all the article states is that the "station was proposed to be built as part of the proposed DART Underground project, and (as neither are funded or planned) neither yet exist". The article on the DART Underground can (and does) already state the exact same thing. Hence this meets WP:MERGEREASON. Guliolopez (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2018 (UTC)