Talk:China International Capital Corporation
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:China International Capital Corp)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Requested move 16 November 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move as proposed. (non-admin closure) Bradv 23:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
China International Capital Corp → China International Capital Corporation – The company was well known as CICC, per MoS Corp. should not be used Matthew_hk tc 12:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Amakuru (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment it looks like most sources do call it "Corp",[1][2][3] and I'm not aware of the MOS rule mentioned. There might also be a case for simply calling it CICC. Best to discuss this I think. — Amakuru (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- the MoS i mentioned Wikipedia:NCCORP. The full name China International Capital Corporation Limited and abb. CICC was quite well known, just should it follow the MoS for
Legal status may be included, even when disambiguation is not needed, for companies that are commonly known by acronyms such as British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC). Do not abbreviate the legal status in these cases, unless the abbreviated form is preferred by the company in question.
- Matthew_hk tc 12:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support. A minor matter but nom is quite right, and I was also unaware of this MOS clause. Good catch. Andrewa (talk) 20:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Advising on HNA acquisition of Ingram
[edit]Thinking more details would be a good thing, considering. Wikipietime (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)