Jump to content

Talk:Child pornography laws in Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Sorry a bit new to this, but thought i'd point this out: "child pornography means an article that describes or depicts, in a manner that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or who looks like, a child under 16 years of age (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not);"[1]

This is from WA CLASSIFICATION (PUBLICATIONS, FILMS AND COMPUTER GAMES) ENFORCEMENT ACT 1996

Also found:

For each other state i found the following acts:

119.11.21.201 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

$9000 fine? someone has a sense of humour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.250.141 (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Legal status of psilocybin mushrooms which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 June 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: TBD. Redundant. See Talk:Legal_status_of_psilocybin_mushrooms#Requested_move_8_June_2017 В²C 18:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Child pornography laws in AustraliaLegality of child pornography in Australia – Several different formats exist for the titles of articles regarding the legality of a particular thing. I believe that all of these should be consistent with each other and that that format should be "Legality of X" (instead of "Legal status of X, Laws regarding X, etc.) Others have noted that "legality" is a more common term when referring to whether something is legal or illegal than "legal status". Michipedian (talk) 01:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Child pornography vs “general pornography”

[edit]

The introduction contains this bizarre, unexplained, unsourced and misspelt statement:

It is interesting that possession of general pornography is not illegal in any state, while possession of children pornography carries significant penalties.

This statement was added at 2019-08-20 01:39 by @Enthusiast01, who remains active on this project. Hopefully they will provide an explanation here. If they do not, I suggest removing this statement.

Brianjd (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]