Talk:Chicago Harbor Light

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guessing

The date on which the lighthouse was moved is variously reported as 1917, 1918 or 1919 by the sources.
I do not know if the height figure is for the light source, or of the top of the tower.
I got the height above sea level by adding 82 ft to 579 ft, a commonly given level of Lake Michican above sea level, so this figure could well be off a few feet.
I derived the coordinates from google and yahoo maps, and I could be off by as much as an arc-second--my figure should not be used for navigation. Speciate 21:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the height of the tower based upon the majority of the sources. I note that Terry Pepper's databases are in conflict with some of the sources (including his own article on Grosse Point Light), and I've written to him about this. There is one measurement for tower height, which goes from the base of the tower to the tip of the lantern vent. In any event, "height" in the infobox refers to the focal plane height relative to mean water level, not to distance above sea level. This is because in an era before GPS the height of the focal plane above the water level was a way to triangulate your distance from the light. A full discussion of this is at the Databases in Terry Pepper Seeing the Light. I would note that Terry Pepper's databases on tower height and focal plane do have references to specific iterations of the Coast Guard lightlists, but he has written to me that those sources are in conflict. As to the coordinates, I would think that the satelite picture in Google that I linked should resolve that issue. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

I also put in a bunch of links that might provide sources on the date of the move. I would say that as a general rule, Terry Pepper is very thorough in his documentation and research, and is (IMHO) generally more reliable than even the Coast Guard website and the National Park Service Inventory of Historic Lights. In any event, if you root around in the links, the answers have got to be there. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

I changed the coordinates per the USCG Volume 7, and it seemed to work. Take a look at the satelite view. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Disposition of the original Third Order Fresnel lens

I note that Terry Pepper, Seeing the Light, writes that the original lens is still in place. However, I went with the information in the National Park Service, Maritime Heritage Program, Inventory of Historic Lights which says it was moved to Cabrillo National Monument. While I have no idea which is true, Pepper says he's never personally visited this light, and the National Park Service would seem to be in the best position to know about a move of the lens, I think. The Coast Guard site lacks any specifics on this lens. I would add that the National Parks Inventory also says in the Grosse Point Light article that only three original Fresnel lenses remain in place on the Great Lakes. http://www.nps.gov/history/maritime/nhl/grossept.htm I would add that this statement is wrong, as I personally have seen and know that the 3.5 order Fresnel lens is still in place at Sturgeon Point Light, and that isn't cited in their article. So one must also 'take with a grain of salt' the representations made in the National Park Service inventory. However, if the article intends to limit consideration to only lenses that have been in place since day one at a particular light, then it would be correct, as Sturgeon Point's lens was replaced in the 1880s, and a larger lens put in.7&6=thirteen (talk) 12:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

In passing, I note that at least one source (cited in the article) claims that this is the only 2nd Order Fresnel lens left in situ on the Great Lakes. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Rowlett, Russ Lighthouse Directory link

Rowlett, Russ, Indiana Lighthouses University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill doesn't work. But if you go to the list of lights at Rowlett, he has the page for the Indiana lights. It's a mystery to me. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

The correct link is: Rowlett, Russ, Lighthouse Directory, Indiana ligthouses. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Current lens

While I would guess that the current lens (if I am correct as to my guess) would go in the lighthouse infobox as

| currentlens = 300 mm Tidelands Signal acrylic.

However, I can't find a source for the current lens, at least not on line. It belongs in the infobox. Anybody got a source? 7&6=thirteen (talk) 12:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Removed the statement about Rawley Point

I've removed the statement about the disposition of the skeletal tower from the exhibition. It isn't relevant to the discussion of this light, and secondary sources disagree on where it went. See under Talk:Rawley Point Light for more discussion; note that primary sources of the time state that it was destined for the Waackaack Rear Range Light, as do some of our secondary sources. Mangoe (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicago Harbor Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/lists/towers.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/lists/focalheight.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130074143/http://www.terrypepper.com:80/lights/index.htm to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.[reply]

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

All the links worked. Not dead links. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicago Harbor Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421203756/http://arlhs.com/awards/U_list.html to http://arlhs.com/awards/U_list.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago Harbor Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]