Talk:Cheung Kwok-che
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below; I invite the participants to contribute to an RFC on the general topic at WT:NC-ZH#Names of people for Hong Kong. Dekimasuよ! 18:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Cheung Kwok-che → Peter Cheung Kwok-che – His English name is Peter and commonly used in English sources, so the name should follow the Hong Kong naming style—blending Chinese and English name. Or just Peter Cheung if you want. George Ho (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. There's no HK-English style blending to follow, since this is a inconsistent-applied self-invention. Use Cheung Kwok-che as on 7government sites. --Cold Season (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Cold Season, how much are you familiar with Hong Kong? Peter Cheung has been more common than the current name in news articles. Why not Peter Cheung instead? --George Ho (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment HK does have a local style that does use ENGLISHname SURname CHINESEname . It is not a local Wikipedia invention since it can be found in a wide variety of sources, and existed prioer to the invention of the Web or consumer Internet (just look at English language Hong Kong newspaper archives from the 80's, which predates the web and consumer internet) -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support as originally proposed -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment there's a few "Peter Cheung"s in the film industry, one of which is an award winning film editor -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- The argument is on a basis on "HK style naming," which is faulty as it does not exist nor recognized. Arguing for a move due to a so-called HK style naming (applying that label is a self-invention) is faulty. If a source use a certain name, then we use that name. --Cold Season (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Four articles use the proposed name. --George Ho (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- We do not use official names because they are official. It clearly is used, since in one of these other move requests George showed that Hong Kong newspapers used this style. Not every jurisdiction has laws specifying the exact form a person's name should take and which all media should use, we do not all live in places where the government specifies every way a name can be displayed. WP:RS use the form indicated by George, such as The STandard (biggest English newspaper in HK), the major newspaper SCMPSouth China Morning Post; Even the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Stop talking nonsense about this style not existing. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 09:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Inconsistent usage of such a naming (English-Chinese blend) does not mean that it has become a convention, so a move to the proposed name on the basis of such a non-existent convention is faulty. --Cold Season (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support as originally proposed -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Same reason as with other ones you moved or trying to move, we need to avoid using long titles such as 'Peter Cheung Kwok-che' per WP:TITLE, it should be either 'Peter Cheung' or just 'Cheung Kwok-che', per WP:NC-ZH. TheAvatar (discuss–?)
Seventy-three articles use Peter Cheung; six use Cheung Kwok-che, unfortunately. --George Ho (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)- I take it back; there are so many Peter Cheungs, so specific sources using "Peter Cheung Kwok-che" are The Standard, book of 2004 elections. SCMP, this book, and that book use the current title. I conclude that this person is seldom or rarely covered by sources. I tried finding other sources mentioning this person without avail. --George Ho (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. No reason to follow the (claimed) local style, which is unknown to most readers. Andrewa (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cheung Kwok-che. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213025731/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?art_id=147686&con_type=1 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?art_id=147686&con_type=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061031080923/http://www.cpu.gov.hk:80/tc/documents/csd/csd_bio160906.pdf to http://www.cpu.gov.hk/tc/documents/csd/csd_bio160906.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)