Talk:Chester General rail crash

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Causes section

This section is confusingly written. Was the freight train intentionally operated unbraked as far as Helsby? I get the feeling it was and this contributed to the guard's forgetting to couple the brake pipes on reversal. The wording "so that extra brake power was available" adds to the confusion. Extra brake power wasn't available because of the guard's omission. My current interpretation of the section is that the train was intentionally run unbraked (though I can't think why) as far as Helsby, where it needed to reverse. The intention was to connect the vacuum pipes once the locomotive had run round because the brakes would be needed on the approach to Chester due to the down gradient. However, due to the guard's omission and the driver's neglect to perform a brake test, the extra braking wasn't available when it was needed. That's my current interpretation after reading it through several times, but as I don't know the facts I'm reluctant to edit. The item ought to be clear on first reading. I trust the guard and driver were sent to bed without any supper that night. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Name

Why is this article about an accident that happened in 1972 entitled "Chester General rail crash " when the station had long been renamed "Chester" railway station in 1969? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.2.244 (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because Major Olver's report is entitled "Railway Accident Report on the Derailment and consequent Fire that occurred on 8th May 1972 at Chester General Station". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]