Talk:Chess variant

Chess Mid‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Three-check chess[edit]

Is any one interested to help me create an article for three-check? Geekpotato24 (talk) 15:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was one a couple years ago. After discussion, it was redirected to the list of chess variants, where it's covered, due to lack of secondary source coverage. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article on Three-check chess existed until July 2018, when a deletion discussion decided it should be changed to a redirect. You can see the final version of the article before this redirection here. This redirection happened after a user who has served several blocks vehemently took against how the rules of the game were written and caused a lot of disruption - the article seemingly got redirected as a way to neuter the source of disruption. In my opinion (which has not changed since the discussion) this redirection was a very bad decision and I would support you in getting the article reinstated. I generally think we have far too many article on chess variants, but, because it is played extensively, I believe Three-check is one of the variants worthy of an article. --LukeSurl^{t c} 16:44, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll work on finding sources first. Geekpotato24 (talk) 00:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes[edit]

This page has been PC protected for six months.[1] See Wikipedia:Pending changes.

If any established editors would like to be able to accept and reject pending changes, please read Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes and especially Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Becoming a reviewer, then apply for the pending change reviewer user right at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer. Feel free to drop me a line on my talk page if you need help. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to plural[edit]

We have list of chess variants and Category:Chess variants, and the concept is plural - this article doesn't describe "a" chess variant, but the concept of all variants. I propose renaming this (and Shogi variant) to plular (chess variants, shogi variants). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, Maybe? For me it doesn't matter either way. I imagine there's probably a "proper" way of doing this hidden somewhere in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. --LukeSurl^t c 16:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start a RM. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 June 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chess variant → Chess variants – Per the discussion above - plural name seems to fit with MoS/similar articles/category batter. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. While this article does not describe any singular chess variant, the concept of "chess variant" is singular and each variant exists independently. It's the same why we have an article called board game, not board games. JIP | Talk 12:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per WP:PLURAL._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Opppse, ah, I knew there would be a guideline on this somewhere. WP:PLURAL is pretty unambiguous here. --LukeSurl^t c 10:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Categories and lists are nearly always in the plural form so that's not really relevant here. I see no good reason to go against the WP:PLURAL guideline. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It's nearly always the case that we have "List of [plural]", "Category:[plural]" and subject article "[singular]". — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 12:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose like Variant of concern its common to refer to a single variant when playing a game of chess. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Three-check chess[edit]

Pending changes[edit]

See also variants[edit]

Rename to plural[edit]

Requested move 23 June 2021[edit]