Jump to content

Talk:Charlotte Motor Speedway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCharlotte Motor Speedway has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
September 29, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 16, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that drivers "dodge[d] track blemishes" more than each other during the first race at the Charlotte Motor Speedway?
Current status: Good article

Dirt track

[edit]

Why do they mention the zMax dragway, but not the Dirt Track at Lowes Motor Speedway? The dirt track was there first, and hosts World of Outlaw sprint car and late model events. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.0.64.154 (talk) 17:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dirt track now included! Lvi56 (talk) 06:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge collapse

[edit]

A pedestrian bridge here collapsed in 1999 or 2000, injuring some 80 people; we should include something on that. --Golbez (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to leave this incident out for the time being. I haven't found information that I am satisfied with about the incident. While many were injured, there's not much to support how the collapse happened and what actions followed, apart from some lawsuits. It's been difficult to round up all the news on multiple lawsuits, and find info on the exact cause of the collapse. Perhaps another editor can dig up something.Lvi56 (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I'll be doing some major cleanup and rewrite of this article over the next few days. Already have a good portion of it outlined and written outside of wiki. For anyone watching the page, expect a huge improvement soon, with goal of GA status.Lvi56 (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've hidden and removed the Nascar stats. Kept some hidden for future reference if needed by other editors. Removed list of race winners, such lists are usually included on the race pages. Lvi56 (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Charlotte Motor Speedway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Voices in my Head WrestleMania XXVII 01:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The tags for citations have not been addressed, and there are some unsourced sections. Since there hasn't been work done on it since the above review, I'm going to fail the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indy Racing League history

[edit]

Indy Racing League races were held at the circuit in 1997 and 1998, with Buddy Lazier and Kenny Bräck winning the mid-summer Saturday night 500k (208 lap) races on the circuit. In 1999, the race was moved to the first weekend in May, the last race before the Indianapolis 500. On the 61st lap, a crash led to a car losing a tire, which was then propelled into the stands by another car. Three spectators were killed and eight others were injured in the incident.

As reported by IRL announcer Mike King, grandstands in the apex of Turn 1 were closed, but seats in Turns 1 and 2 past the apex were open. Seats outside of Turn 4 were also closed. When attendance grew beyond the 50,000 expected for the race, extra sections of stands were opened, and one of them was the section of track where the debris flew in Turn 4. Buddy Lazier was leading the race at the time of the caution for the Lap 62 crash involving Stan Wattles and John Paul Jr. when Wattles’ rear suspension failed, with the right rear wheel assembly hit by Paul, launching it into the grandstands. The SpeedVision video of the crash and analysis is on YouTube here. After pit stops, Greg Ray was leading the race when the race was abandoned. The race was canceled after 79 laps, and the IRL did not return.

That incident, and a previous incident in July 1998 in a Champ Car race at Michigan which also killed three spectators (that race was run to its finish), led to new rules requiring cars to have tethers attached to wheel hubs in an effort to prevent such incidents from happening again. New catch fencing was also invented, curved so debris could not sail as easily into the grandstands.

Following the accident, a short series of bombings took place in Lowe's stores in North Carolina, injuring three, and prompting some to think there may be a link with a relative of one of the victims. When George Rocha was arrested for the bombings, he claimed that he was angry about the crash at the speedway, but he later confessed that it was retribution for being caught shoplifting and an attempt at extortion. [1]

Results

[edit]
Season Date Race Name Winning Driver Chassis Engine Team
1997 July 26 VisionAire 500k United States Buddy Lazier Dallara Oldsmobile Hemelgarn Racing
1998 July 25 VisionAire 500k Sweden Kenny Bräck Dallara Oldsmobile A. J. Foyt Enterprises
1999 May 1 VisionAire 500k Race abandoned after 79 laps (spectators killed)

5555 Concord Parkway South? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgsho (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charlotte Motor Speedway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Motor Speedway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can we re-add the xfinty and truck races in the info box?

[edit]

The Xfinity and truck races were recently removed from the info box. Can we re-add them? I think they are still events that should be listed. RBF48 (talk) 01:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Charlotte Motor Speedway/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 05:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Prose review

[edit]

Lede

[edit]
  • After initially refusing, Turner eventually partnered with Smith after Smith agreed to sell shares needed for the track's construction. - Any way to avoid repeating Smith twice in three words?
  • the track's construction. Construction of the facility was completed in less than 11 months. - Any way to avoid repeating construction twice in succession?

Description

[edit]
  • In 2019, the speedway's chicane was modified.[8] ... Further modifications to two of the road course's chicanes were announced in 2024. - We went from one chicane to at least three? I'm not following.
  • Charlotte Motor Speedway (CMS) is located directly next to U.S. Route 29. - Makes more sense to introduce the abbreviation in the previous subsection, which only uses "the speedway"
  • You don't seem to have introduced that the track is located in Concord in the body of the article

History

[edit]
  • collaborating with local track officials - How were there officials when CMS didn't exist? Were there other tracks in the area?
  • the fact that Turner did not have enough funds to start his own track ... Smith announced his intention to build his own speedway to rival Turner's on April 22, 1959, the same day Turner announced his track - If he thought that Turner was never going to complete the project, is it truly "to rival"?
  • but was delayed due to legal issues - Any further information available?
  • Reports of feral hornets were also made, leading to multiple workers quitting. - Why not simplify to "Feral hornets led to multiple workers quitting."
  • a mutiny formed between Flowe and his workers, citing unpaid fees and bounced checks. - Mutiny is not used in its dictionary definition here. This sounds like Flowe and his employees held a labor action or work stoppage. Also goes to neutrality, as a mutiny deals with lawful leadership, whereas this was a contract dispute
  • Nearing the end of the facility's construction, a mutiny formed between Flowe and his workers, citing unpaid fees and bounced checks. On June 9, days before the World 600, Flowe parked several earthmovers on the track and stopped construction, with Flowe threatening to sue. - Whom was Flow threatening to sue?
  • CMS cost around two million dollars according to McIlvaine, with $74,000 in debts owed to Flowe by the end of its initial construction. - You've provided adjusted-for-inflation values elsewhere. That would be useful here.
  • a souvenir program advertising seller - was he selling advertising spaces in the souvenir program, selling souvenir programs, advertising souvenir programs, or...?
  • by both Smith and Turner, with Turner threatening legal action. - Any way of avoiding the repetition of "Turner"?
  • Moneys owing - Another spot where adjusted-for-inflation may be useful.
  • ceasing all officers' and directors' positions - This doesn't read as grammatical. Do you mean "with all officers and directors removed from their positions"?
  • On December 9, Craven ruled to let the track's management find loans and funds to creditors who were seeking money, with Robinson being ordered to come up with a plan to ensure the $900,000 payment to various creditors, essentially saving CMS. - Not clear. Do you mean that Craven ruled to allow the track's management to find loans, with which they could pay off their creditors?
  • However, Cross, who was planning to loan the rest of the funds needed, was rejected. - Do you mean "However, a loan offered by Cross to cover the remaining debts rejected."?
  • December to January 3, 1963 - Any specific start date?
  • The track later oversaw numerous driver fatalities in the mid-1960s; longtime driver Glenn "Fireball" Roberts died on July 2, 1964 due to complications from a fiery crash at the 1964 World 600, - you've introduced Roberts above; the link should be provided there, and perhaps his full name.
  • spat on each other in the media - per WP:SLANG, we should use a more formal term than "spat". They were certainly not exchanging saliva.
  • I see you are using "by [year]" a lot. Generally, "by" means something happened before a year and would go with present/past perfect, whereas "in" means something happened during a year and uses the past tense.
  • levigation - worth including a link to Wiktionary?

Events

[edit]
  • There are a lot of small subsections here. Is it worth combining them to reduce the extent to which the article is broken up?
  • Fixed. Let me know if you want it tweaked further.

General

[edit]
  • I have edited the article. Please review.
  • A few more currency amounts that would benefit from adjustment for inflation
  • Earwig's Tool shows no copyright violation.

Source review

[edit]
  • Please review sources for capitalization (compare Ref 28 and 81, for example)
  • Please review article to ensure that references appear in order (note [27][26] in Description, for example)
  • Please review to ensure that inclusion of the publisher is consistent (compare Ref 193 with Ref 194)

Image review

[edit]
  • ALT text is not standardized; please ensure that all images either have or do not have ALT text.

Conclusion

[edit]
  •  On hold Looks like there is a bit of work to do still, but overall this is in pretty good shape.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Crisco 1492: Thank you so much for taking on this review! Got around to your concerns, and I hope it looks all right from your standpoint. Let me know if you want anything else. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 07:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You've very welcome, Nascar9919. The prose looks good now.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Crisco 1492: Got around to some of the more grammar issues and I think the references should be fine. If you need anything else like more inflation figures, let me know. Thank you! Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 18:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, Nascar9919. I do see that capitalization is still not standardized in the references (contrast Ref 137 with Ref 141 and subsequent, for example). How are we on the images?  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Crisco 1492: Regarding the capitalization, I thought it was correct to make the titles' capitalization correlate to what it says on the source (in this case, newspaper)? i.e., 137 and 141 having different capitalization for each title. Thought the only exception is if the entire title is in all caps. I never had someone bring that up until now. Correct me if I'm wrong.
    As for the images, the diagram has some coordinates as its source according to its info page. I also switched around the placement of the second image. Category has been made for the Smith image as well. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 06:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Nascar9919. WP:CITESTYLE specifies that "citations within any given article should follow a consistent style", which is where my question about capitalization comes in - variations between sentence-case and title-case are indicative of inconsistency. As for the images, I did mention some concerns about the copyright status of a couple of the pictures included here.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Crisco 1492: Changed the capitalization of the sources. Also, I thought it'd be best to just remove the August Jam photo. If there's anything else you want done, let me know. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 20:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, looks good. I may be a bit too cautious on the logo (and a DR on Commons takes forever, so it wouldn't be fair to the nomination to have it wait). It does appear to be a borderline case, as US Copyright law has a high bar for TOO, so I think it can slide for now.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • Source: Muhleman, Max (July 19, 1960). "Repair job begins". The Charlotte News. pp. 4B. Archived from the original on February 3, 2024. Retrieved February 2, 2024 – via Newspapers.com. "The 600 will go down in history as the only race ever run in which drivers were forced to dodge track blemishes more often than other cars, and there can be no argument that the condition of the turns augmented the action in that inaugural event."
Improved to Good Article status by Nascar9919 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 684 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Crisco 1492: Article long enough and recent GA. Hooks are sourced, cited inline, and interesting. Specifically for ALT1, though isn't the "shotgun-toting driver" trying to get the workers back to work? Otherwise, ALT0 and ALT2 are both good to go. Juxlos (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charlotte_Motor_Speedway&oldid=1251405887"