Talk:Charlie Aust
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charlie Aust article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Charlie Aust appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jack Frost (talk) 02:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the last commanding officer of the Rhodesian Light Infantry Charlie Aust (pictured) described himself as "seedy moustache, glasses and intensely ugly" so soldiers knew how to identify him? Source: RLIRA
- Reviewed: 1873–74 Scottish Cup
- Comment:
The picture is being croppedPlease ignore the picture, don't use it
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 08:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, long enough, adequately sourced, and Earwig comes up empty. I like the hook,
the picture – if it goes through – could perhaps use a clarifying (left), although Aust is obviously in the foreground, so not necessarily a hard requirement for me.Striking, just noticed the comment. Per the provided source, I have corrected the spelling of "intensly" to "intensely" both here and in the article – The C of E, hope you don't mind. AngryHarpytalk 09:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, I don't mind. I was copying the quote from the source. It might have been misspelt there but I'm fine with it being corrected @AngryHarpy:. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Article is new enough, long enough, adequately sourced, and Earwig comes up empty. I like the hook,
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class biography (military) articles
- B-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- B-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Zimbabwe articles
- Low-importance Zimbabwe articles
- Start-Class Rhodesia articles
- Unknown-importance Rhodesia articles
- Rhodesia task force articles
- WikiProject Zimbabwe articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles