Talk:Charles Chambers (referee)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 05:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
General comments
- Lead:
in London for three decades, and was as well known
I removed the comma - Lead:
His ruling in a 1938 match led to a minimum length for a being specified in the official rules of the game.
removed "for a" - redundant - Biography: Capitalised "Championship"
- Biography:
He was the subject of the BBC National Programme show Sports Talk in 1934
changed toHe was the subject of the 1934 BBC National Programme show Sports Talk.
- Biography:
On 14 November 1938 when Alec Brown was playing Tom Newman at Thurston's Hall in the 1938/1939 Daily Mail Gold Cup.
- I removed "when" as it does not make sense to include that word. - Biography
The preview in The Radio Times mentioned that he had marked for H. W. Stevenson and Tom Carpenter during a Zeppelin raid and had the text
removed "Match" - Biography
Joyce Gardner praised Chambers, who refereed many of the women's championships, as "undoubtedly the world's greatest referee of billiards and snooker"; another women's champion, Ruth Harrison, wrote that he inspired confidence in players. Snooker historian Clive Everton later wrote that Chambers was "recognised as supreme in his profession".
Changed toJoyce Gardner praised Chambers, who refereed many of the women's championships, as "undoubtedly the world's greatest referee of billiards and snooker". Another women's champion, Ruth Harrison, wrote that he inspired confidence in players. Snooker historian Clive Everton later wrote that Chambers was "recognised as supreme in his profession".
- better broken into two sentences rather than joined with semi-colon
Source checking
- [2] Can you please Wikilink this to the appropriate publication, if we have one on Wikipedia? Otherwise, the reference needs further information for source integrity. I am unable to locate this reference anywhere. Rather frustratingly, there are hundreds of papers with this name mentioning Billiards on 2 April 1929. I did try to locate it! (Fancy some candies for 70c per lb?)
- [5]/[6] Same? What Times? Is this via Newspapers.com?
- [11] Again, another source with a very generic title. There are countless papers with this title. In such circumstances, the publication city or some identifying feature would be really helpful for both reviewers and readers alike.
- [15]
- [10](a)
- [10](b)
- Overall, I would prefer to see more sources linked. However, what is available for checking, checks out. I am happy to AGF the other sources given your considerable history of creating outstanding work. None of the claims appear likely to be challenged, nor are they controversial. Sources have been provided, and it is no barrier to GA merely because I cannot access them.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.