Talk:Central Railroad of Indianapolis

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains Stub‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm having some trouble fiuring out the history of this.

1918 ICC decision including history
1976: lease continued by Conrail as the Rolling Mill Industrial Track, running on Capitol Avenue south of Union Station (property not transferred)
1984-01-13: ICC rules that offer by N. K. Hurst Company and Rolling Mills, Inc. is bone fide and reasonable; Conrail had filed for abandonment
A November 1986 ZTS (zone track spot) map booklet (p. 24) shows it still there, as the Rolling Mill Lead
1989-08-14: leases Kokomo-Marion from NS
1991-12: Kokomo Rail Company (later Kokomo Grain Company?) acquires Marion-Amboy from CSX, with CERA operating

I have no idea if the companies are the same, and, if not, why the latter chose the name. --NE2 18:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And... it was a different company! " The above-referenced docket numbers have been changed to correct docketing errors that occurred at the time the proceedings were instituted. The AB-289 designation should not have been used in these cases because it is assigned to another railroad, namely Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis, Inc. (Emphasis added.) The similarity of the two carriers' names appears to have been the source of the docketing error. The AB-289 designation remains with Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis, Inc., and the AB-511 designation is assigned to Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis. Please correct your records in accordance with this Notice." That's pretty silly. --NE2 18:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]