This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Central National Committee (Chetniks) is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Central National Committee of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia → Central National Committee (Chetniks) – this is not the common name in reliable sources in English. The current title is used in only three sources, [1], only one of which is independent of the subject (Lees) and the proposed name, or a close match to it (allowing for our disambiguation policies), has about 250 hits [2], including books by academic experts on the Chetniks, such as Tomasevich, Hoare, Ramet, and Milazzo, all of whom use "Central National Committee" combined with the word Chetnik or Chetniks. The current name also appears (from the placing of it in quotation marks by Lees) to have been effectively a propaganda name used by the committee after Mihailović was removed from the Yugoslav government-in-exile, and is therefore quite imprecise and misleading, implying that it was some sort of ruling body over Yugoslavia, when it clearly was merely a Chetnik organ throughout its existence. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting.Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions09:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rationale given by nom persuades me. Ramet, Tomasevich, Hoare and other established academics on matters of WWII Yugoslavia use the word "Chetnik" when referring the this organization. It is the common name in English, and as such it better suits the article than the current name does. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.