Talk:Casefile

Australia: Crime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Casefile is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

BLAR

I WP:BLARed List of Casefile True Crime Podcast episodes because I don't think it passes WP:NLIST. If you disagree with my assessment feel free to revert my edit. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This blank and redirect has been undone. I do not believe that WP:NLIST applies to the episode list, because the episode list has been spun off from the main article into a sub-article. The list is notable, because the Casefile article is notable. What should have occurred is that a merger of the two articles should have been proposed and discussed. To me, using the blank and redirect approach, without discussion, is article deletion by stealth. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concern

Hello Jabberjaw, it looks like you edit this article quite a bit. It looks like the two lede paragraphs are copied and pasted from here: [1]. I was going to just tag the lede, but I didn't see an option for a small maintenance tag. I could open a copyright violation investigation for the section, but that often takes time especially since they would need to rewrite the content rather than delete it. I can't tell if the link is a mirror of Wikipedia or not. If it is we should probably add it to the list of mirror websites. If not we should rewrite the lede and probably perform a revdel. Let me know what you think and how you'd prefer to proceed. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, the article was feeling a bit aged and needed a spruce up... so thanks for helping to trigger that. Regarding this supposed "copyright violation", to be honest, I am not sure if this is sincere or that you are simply trying to be disruptive. For example, a simple review of the lead's formation back in mid-March 2018 (eg, here, here, here, here, and here) shows no evidence of a single copy/paste by me from any other site. Similarly, the lead, as shown in these edits, is clearly evolving towards the version you mention as copy/pasted, which does not make sense if it was already a copy/paste from the start. Further, the lead clearly has citations but you do not specify that any of the content was copied from them. As for being a mirror, the website you specify clearly is - since you would also have to lodge copyright claims on most other Wikipedia pages the site lists, such as My Favorite Murder, Lore, Going West, Dirty John, and probably every other podcast listed there, as they are also easily identified as potential copy/paste violations too with simple Google search comparisons. Finally, Google also shows elements of the lead to have been duplicated here and here (among others) so, for me at least, any assertion of copy/pasting from that site in this instance is clearly unsubstantiated. JabberJaw (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I ran earwig and it came back with a match. I'm in no way trying to be disruptive, which is incredibly obvious considering I brought it to the talk page and pinged an editor actively involved in editing the page for their opinion. If you check my edit history I've opened copyvio investigations for multiple other podcasts and in all instances the content was removed. TipsyElephant (talk) 04:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]