Talk:Case method

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A stub right now

parthkashyap

The case method is a teaching method that is particularly important in business school. Nabeth (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Case studies is research method but case based teaching is a educational method. These two things are mixed in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195. parth kashyap 148.172.205|195.148.172.205]] (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a copyvio?

PARTH KASHYAP, VII- D, ROLL.NO. - 24 BAL BHAVAN PUBLIC SCHOOL I just realized that the current version and one external source linked from this page has many expressions in common.

this edit seems to have imported a number of paragraphs from the pdf file linked as a source of further information. http://www.globalens.com./DocFiles/PDF/cases/Preview/GL1429140P.pdf

Tomos (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Casebook method be merged into Case method. The two cover the same topic -- the widely used method of studying to become a lawyer. Case method students study cases found in casebooks, so what is the difference? Indeed, Casebook method uses "case method" as a synonym.----S. Rich (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)S. Rich (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Also, I note that Business school refers to "case study" as a teaching method while linking to this article. In fact there is a separate case study article, which business school does not link to. Well, the merger proposal stands with the proviso that proper dab and explanation be incorporated into the merged article. 03:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge case study method and casebook method

Despite their similarities, the case study method used in business, social science, life science, and technology courses uses different types of case materials and proceeds somewhat differently from the casebook method used in law courses. Consequently, I vigorously assert that the creation of a disambiguation page is the best approach. Froid 08:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly agree. The case method and the casebook method are 2 very different things. The case method is used in various fields, most notably business, as a teaching method by looking at past events, groups or persons. The casebook method in law schools is about learning the law through reading extracts of, or the entirety of "cases" literally (i.e. reported court judgments, and not merely past events, groups or persons). Anybody in law school will not seriously contend that there is no difference between a legal case, and "case" in its non-legal usage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AurekBesh (talk • contribs) 14:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those two methods are different. I first encountered the case method in law school in 1967 before being drafted (Vietnam Era). When I finished a J.D. in the mid-1970s as an older person, it was even clearer that giving law students a bunch of cases and then hoping they would glean the overarching principle from that...well, that was a very inefficient approach. Doing something for a long time, since the 1870s when Langdell started at Harvard Law, doesn't make it a good idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.27.38 (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Case method. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Case method. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160524192431/http://www.thecasecentre.org/ to http://www.thecasecentre.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Case method. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151113114043/http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/iima-cases.html to http://iimahd.ernet.in/iima-cases.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]