Talk:Carpo (moon)

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Name?

I believe the name of this satellite is Karpo, with a K, and the eccentricity seems wrong. Look here: [1].

Any opinions?

Smartech 21:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We need the IAU announcement to sort out the spelling. As for the eccentricity, the data NASA puts on the web is unreliable. They confuse radius and diameter much of the time, and I've seen 2 or 3 contradictory values for the same datum within a single page. I don't know if the 'fact' sheets are any better than the rest of their postings for the public.

Eccentricity

Hawaii[2] has yet a third eccentricity, a whopping 0.43, and the spelling Carpo. kwami 02:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, well so what value for the eccentricity should I use for the bulgarian article? Smartech 02:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It actually might have to do with the Kozai effect that is mentioned, the eccentricity being unstable, and the inclination too. Not known how quickly it changes though, maybe not that quickly. Smartech 02:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the Kozai effect worked that quickly, I doubt Jupiter would have any irregulars left! They may be estimates from different dates, or just typos. Given that NASA is unreliable on diameters as well, I personally would go by Sheppard's site. That's been updated in 2005, but I don't know if the old values were updated as well, or if only new data were added. Might want to ask whoever wrote or contributed to this article, though, as they might have better data available. kwami 03:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carpo (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305023003/http://cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/08100/08125.html to http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/08100/08125.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]