This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
Per the 2/18 AfD, I have attempted to remove some of the trivia and repeated information and the rearrange the article into a more encyclopedic form. I think I've been partially successful. For example, removed repeated birth dates and some student activities ("girls in the bathroom", writing, etc). Also removed comments from trade publications, which are not conventional for "solid" WP articles (they are usually a sign that the authoring editors are straining to show notability), as well as text at the end of the article that had a very obvious PROMO nature regarding her other, less known and new books. There are still sufficient references, but the problem with an article like this is that it still has a "laundry list" feel, being full of relatively secondary aspects about her life that aren't really related to her notability (like competitive swimming and such). I realize that these details are sourced, but, like so many WP articles appearing in the last few years they're sort of "human interest" rather than "encyclopedic content". This could actually be stubbed. As far as notability, I think it passes, but it is certainly borderline. Eating disorder / weight issues is a huge genre and holdings of her books aren't really too impressive in this area (e.g. her My Name is Caroline at ~400 holdings vs Anderson's Wintergirls at ~4000 holdings. Best, Agricola44 (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]