Jump to content

Talk:Carla Monroe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk09:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that before Carla Monroe's vocals were used in MK's 17, she was working in a prison?
    • ALT1: ... that D.O.D. & Carla Monroe's "Still Sleepless" spent twenty-three weeks at the top of the UK Independent Singles Breakers Chart?
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: QPQ forthcoming - remind me. At time of writing, Refill is down (and I really, really don't want to have to format all those URLs manually).

5x expanded by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Carla Monroe; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Official Charts citation issue needs to be dealt with before I can pass this. Passed. Grnrchst (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, no single usable place says 23 weeks beyond List of UK Independent Singles Breakers Chart number ones of the 2020s, so they all have to be used. I need longer to decide what the solution to this is.--Launchballer 18:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the interim, Template:Did you know nominations/Falaki Shirvani.--Launchballer 08:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Grnrchst: Is this better?--Launchballer 09:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's better now that it doesn't have the issues of citation overkill and bare urls, but I worry it still borders on synth territory. Is there a reason you're threading these different placements together instead of using the data from the "WoC (Weeks on Chart)" column? --Grnrchst (talk) 09:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. "Weeks on Chart" gives a number for the time it spent on the entire top twenty, while 23 is the number it spent at the top of the chart. Such routine calculations are explicitly allowed per WP:CALC, and my number is corroborated by List of UK Independent Singles Breakers Chart number ones of the 2020s.--Launchballer 09:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for clarifying. Passing this now. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just to say that the OCC website has been reworked to include sub-chart positions, so I no longer need to synthesise anything.--Launchballer 13:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]