This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
The New York Times articles go into the details of the foundation, which should help keep it out of AfD. I just posted the link without adding the material from the New York Times article. I did add the earilest info I could find and am not clear if they were founded in 1992 or 1994. 1994 would make more sense, but the 2002 New York Times article said they were found ten yuears prior (e.g. 1992). They specialize in releasing news, so there are a lot of news articles mentioning them. The Cardinal Kung Foundation did testify before the U.S. Congress (August 9, 1994 * July 20, 1995 * May 19, 1997 * June 23, 1997 * June 24, 1997 * May 14, 1998 * June 4, 1998 * July 27, 1999 * January 27, 2000 * September 19, 2000 * December 5, 2000 * July 22, 2002 * September 25, 2003 * October 1, 2003 * November 6, 2003 * November 19, 2003 * March 2, 2004 * June 16, 2005 * September 15, 2005 * April 26, 2006 * June 28, 2006), and you might find some of that at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/index.html. Their website is detailed and has a good database of their press releases. Some of that may be used in the article. They probably have press clippings about themselves, but their website is large and may take some time to find it. -- Jreferee(Talk)21:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
