Talk:Cambridge South railway station

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2017. The result of the discussion was merge to Transport in Cambridge.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Demerged

Article has been demerged from Transport in Cambridge as construction of the station has been approved and funded. JeanPassepartout (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal, Approval and Funding

This railway station is still in a consultation phase. Some key funding for the station was provided in the recent governmental budget but there are a lot of stages a station has to go through before a station gets approved, one of the main ones being the Transport and Works Act Order which is not projected until Summer 2021. (And in fact the article you used as a reference still says it is proposed) Difficultly north (talk) Simply south alt. 23:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I take it that you are not proposing that the article be deleted? It is proposed and it is funded: that for me satisfies WP:CRYSTAL challenges provided that it doesn't jump the gun on precise timing and location. The same is true of Cambourne and Tempsford stations: we should most definitely have at least stub articles in all three cases, even if they never happen. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not proposing deletion. As with many this has had a lot of groundwork. But anyway this was meant to be a discussion about whether this approved or not. Difficultly north (talk) Simply south alt. 20:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I over-interpreted your note. (And I agree, it is not approved yet, if by 'approved' we mean that a TWAO has been made, as I think we must). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]