Talk:Calabarzon

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

All caps?

Is there a reason this is in all caps? -- Cyrius|✎ 23:47, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's an acronym that stands for the provinces it is composed of. CAvite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, and Quezon. TheCoffee 02:35, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eyeballs slid right over that part of the article, whoops. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:59, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CalabarzonA?

We need a local, I think, to clarify the CALABARZON/CALABARZONA issue?

The latter's article seems to indicate that the latter supercedes the former, as being composed of the latter's five components plus one more that's unconnected to the others, is that it? Or am I missing something? DS 14:19, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of this "CALABARZONA". Aurora province is in a different region, and to my knowledge it was never part of CALABARZON. No Google hits for "calabarzona". If this is supposed to be a hoax, it's pretty lame. Coffee 16:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's good enough for me. I'll switch it to a redirect. DS 16:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I would do. Coffee 17:22, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the original components of the Southern Tagalog Region (Region 4) prior to its break-up were: Aurora, CALABARZON, and MIMAROPA. There was a time when the splitting of Region 4 was not official yet, that is, when CALABARZON and MIMAROPA were sub-regions of Region 4. Then there was the issue with Aurora province, so CALABARZON became CALABARZONA for a while.When the split into official regions happened, that was the time when Aurora was officially transferred to Region 3, thus the duration of calling the sub-region CALABARZONA was brief, hence its non-popularity. Although i do remember that some people argued back then that CALABARZON is ok to use over CALABARZONA since the "AR" string would somehow incorporate Aurora into the acronym...Meynardtengco 17:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From my school days, Aurora province has always been part of Region 3 and not region 4. The proper acronym is indeed CALABARZON. Usagichin 06:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal laguna.png

Image:Ph seal laguna.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 22:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal rizal.png

Image:Ph seal rizal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 22:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal cavite.png

Image:Ph seal cavite.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 23:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ph seal batangas.png

The image File:Ph seal batangas.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

region IV

why we have 2 parts in region IV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.152.215 (talk) 08:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a portmanteau

CALABARZON does not appear to be a portmanteau, either in the technical sense of fused function words or in the popular sense of a blend of content words. Rather, it resembles an acronym, formed from the first one or two letters of four provinces, plus the last three of Quezon. Compare such acronyms as radar, from RAdio Detection And Ranging, or NOR gate, from Negation of OR operator. Is there a reliable source that calls CALABARZON a portmanteau? Cnilep (talk) 13:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use on Seals

I've checked the individual seals for the provinces and I noticed that there was a fair use rationale for every one of them. This means we can use the seals for this page, right? Unless there's something I'm not getting. Enlighten me, please. NyanThousand (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just because a rationale exists does not mean that it is valid. Often users just copy/paste rationales and change the article name, take a look at WP:NFCC specifically WP:NFCC#8 Werieth (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'm trying to see if there's something we can do about it but WP:NFCC seems pretty clear on the issue. Shame though. NyanThousand (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calabarzon → CALABARZON – The proper name of the region is in all caps as it is an acronym (like NASA, or UNESCO). Page was moved from "CALABARZON" to "Calabarzon" without discussion. seav (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose. Looks like the current spelling has become common in contemporary reliable sources such as those in Google News. Btw, not all acronyms are capitalized like Jabodetabek, Nabisco and Sunoco. :)--RioHondo (talk) 02:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per search "Calabarzon is" in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No SHOUTING in Wikipedia. 173.160.224.84 (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT, site:www.gov.ph predominantly uses "CALABARZON" but not to anything close to an overwhelming extent. Greg Kaye 05:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calabarzon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rizal Monument in Calamba, Laguna.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Katherine Agapay (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]