Talk:Cabuyao

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Special economic zone#Philippines|Light Industry and Science Park of the Philippines]] The anchor (#Philippines) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Course

what is course offered in mapua cabuyao laguna — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.55.2 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname

The Top Income Earner Municipality of the Philippines - seems unlikely. Rich Farmbrough, 10:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I agree. I have cleaned up the article at large. For example I removed the list of industrial companies in the area, the table that gives the distance of every village from the town's center and collapsed the list of schools so that navigation will be easier for other browsers. The nickname too seems unlikely because being a top income earner isn't a permanent position in any countries anyway. However I still put the page under my watchlist.--JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 02:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

I tagged the climate section FV, especially that the citation tells that the source is [1], which is Boston's climate data. If ever there's a sourcing error and the reference is not really the reference, then the table is a big hoax.--JL 09 ^_q?_c 14:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too many content forks from this article

Why are there so many content forks of just one municipality? To wit:

Barangay Niugan, Cabuyao, Laguna
Barangay Banay-Banay, Cabuyao, Laguna
and everything else that are found to be linked at Template:Cabuyao,_Laguna and Template:Districts of Cabuyao

Surely, not every barangay in this municipality (or city, if the residents ratify their charter) is notable enough to need their own articles. Besides, most of the text seem to have been copied and pasted from one another and have become repetitive (e.g. is the climate from one barangay in one municipality different from another?) I'm initiating a merge unless there is substantial reason to qualify the individual articles for being separately notable. Xeltran (talk) 18:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved, pending resolution of MOSPHIL, another RM may be appropriate Mike Cline (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cabuyao, Laguna → Cabuyao – Per WP:MOSPHIL (newest city of the Philippines) -Jimboy (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT per nom. However, I do believe this naming convention needs to be tweaked a bit due to the neverending surge of city conversions. I also do not believe in the whole cityhood process in the Philippines, as I dread the day of municipality-less provinces. Would our provinces be extinct? :-) RioHondo (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. I agree with you bro! :) -Jimboy (talk) 22:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral While I oppose the current convention for naming cities as elaborated in WP:MOSPHIL (opposed it from the very beginning and still oppose it today), I'm still at a loss as to why the article needs to be moved. Generally, dropping the province is required only of independent cities: articles on component cities may choose to keep the province or not. Either way, I'd like to see where this discussion will go. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 07:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly why the naming convention needs to be changed IMO. It allows even component cities to dump their province despite their continued dependence on provincial revenues, and their continued participation in provincial elections. Anyway, I have already included this in WP:TAMBAY#Changes (or additions) to WP:MOSPHIL. --RioHondo (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Defer as it seems that there's a dispute in WP:MOSPHIL's naming convention for cities. I do express reservations and that the province name should be retained on component city article names. –H T D 16:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have tagged the city naming section in WP:MOSPHIL as "{{Under discussion}}" so any !vote citing WP:MOSPHIL can't be accepted for the meantime. –H T D 17:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator's comment: This move would require moving the disambiguation page Cabuyao; as such the case needs to be made that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of that title.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dunno why the dab page exists, TBH. The second entry points to Cabuyao University, in which case Cabuyao the city should be primary topic (compare Kentucky and University of Kentucky; I'm not even sure if Cabuyao University is referred to as "Cabuyao".). As for the third item there (the fruit), "cabuyao" appears to be an alternate name, and that the article page views is only 1/10 of the Philippine city. Hence "Cabuyao" the place appears to be the primary topic. That means Cabuyao should be a move to a dab page, and Cabuyao should redirect to the city, no matter what happens in the move discussion. –H T D 17:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move

I made a terrible mistake of not reading this talk page first, I've read the Wikipedia:MOSPHIL and went on moving the articles, and talk pages, only to realize that there is a move discussion above, I could revert all of my edits but I'm in favor of moving the articles anyway as Wikipedia:Disambiguation. --Urville86 (talk) 07:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You, me, or someone else could move it back. As per the RM discussion above, this article shouldn't be moved...yet. Xeltran (talk) 07:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Cabuyao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cabuyao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cityofcabuyao.gov.ph/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304030702/http://cityofcabuyao.gov.ph/news_and_events_result.php?id=65 to http://cityofcabuyao.gov.ph/news_and_events_result.php?id=65
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/province.asp?provCode=043400000&provName=LAGUNA&regCode=04&regName=REGION%20IV-A%20%28CALABARZON%29
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cabuyao.gov.ph/history/50-historyofcabuyao
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130505065408/http://www.cityofcabuyao.gov.ph/ to http://www.cityofcabuyao.gov.ph/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.msc.edu.ph/cabuyao/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]