Talk:Bulbinella rossii

Bulbinella rossii has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 25, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bulbinella rossii/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 09:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cactusisme (talk · contribs) 02:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is ready as it met the 6 criteria
It does not contain copyright violations
It does not need cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid.
It is stable

Reference Taylor 1971 checks out on information but page numbers do not relate. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 04:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected it to "pages 11–12, 22". Alexeyevitch^(talk) 05:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: Do you have any other thoughts on the article? I would gladly appreciate any suggestions. :-) Alexeyevitch^(talk) 21:09, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexeyevitch Not for now, thanks. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 08:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cactusisme: is this review going to progress? If not, I would simply close the review and wait for another one (see WP:GAN/I#N4a). I hope things will move along soon - please mention if you're still interested (or not interested) please let me know. Thanks. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 01:06, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch You can close for now, I didn't notice any issues so far. Thanks for your time. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 01:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will do. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 01:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. Questions? four Olliefant (she/her) 05:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bulbinella rossii/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 09:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 23:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC) I will look at this and IMHO I think the previous review probably should've passed this if they didn't find anymore issues Questions? four Olliefant (she/her) 23:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"The roots of B. rossii are often eaten introduced pigs" -> "The roots of B. rossii are often eaten by introduced pigs"

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Description

"The dark green, fleshy, strap-like leaves and are 0.6–1 m long and are" -> "The dark green, fleshy, strap-like leaves ~~and~~ are"

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think "phenylanthraquinones" is two words "phenyl anthraquinones"

It's one word. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy

I would delink "thesis"

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution

I would list Auckland Islands as opposed to just Auckland to avoid confusion with the city

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology

I think the animals linked in paragraph one are MOS:OVERLINK

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation

Ref 25 should have the year (2024), listed for consistency

Done Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.