Talk:Built Ford Tough Series

Page Title

This page needs to be renamed, since the Tour was renamed. Uricarrillo94 (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Uricarrillo94 First of all, there are close to 150 articles that link to this article. Second of all, I believe the tour is only being renamed for one year, the anniversary year. Third, we don't wipe out the history of the BFTS and rename the article, which is essentially deleting the history of the BFTS, that's not how Wikipedia works. We create a new article for the Anniversary Tour that we can link to for any new or existing articles that are created for events in 2018, which will reference the anniversary tour article. And we don't change any existing articles that reference the BFTS, they continue to link to the existing BFTS article. This is an encyclopedia, that means it tells history of things since inception. It's not what you would do on a website where you would update everything to the new and updated model. There really should have been a history for the Bud Light Cup, but it's too late for that now. Additionally, there still continue to be reference to the BFTS in the 2018 events. dawnleelynn^(talk) 16:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Here's a quote from the article, "We are proud to announce that the 2018 season will be known as the PBR 25th Anniversary Tour, an acknowledgment of our visionary founders,s, the great PBR athletes, stock contractors and hard-working men and women who bring fans more than 200 PBR events around the world each year."

See, it says that the 2018 season will be known as the 25th Anniversary Tour, not all seasons going forward. In fact, it would not make sense to call every season the 25th Anniversary Tour, because they aren't. And here's a link to the article for anyone else listening in: A LETTER FROM PBR CEO SEAN GLEASON. dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

This is not a website, you don't destroy the history. You leave it and create a new article. I need to reference what the BFTS says in current articles and new articles I am writing. You want an article for the new tour, you write it or I will will. This is an encyclopedia not a web site. You don't destroy the history by modifying an article to be something new. You leave it as it is and add something new. The Built Ford Tough Series article needs to remain as it is for historical purposes just as the articles that rely on it it will remain as they are for historical purposes. This is how an encyclopedia works. This should have been done with the previous tour as well only I wasn't here to stop it. I am the only one here working in a major way on these articles and I am also a writer in real life on a professional basis. This article needs to exist in its original form. Even the PBR Media Kit has this done this way. dawnleelynn^(talk) 00:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

First of all, thanks for the information. Secondly, it was not my intention to destroy the history of the article. Thirdly, I apologize for my mistakes, but by the looks of your responses, it seems you are a comfrontational individual. Uricarrillo94 (talk) 01:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

There were two editors making edits, so I may have overreacted. Also, you never responded to my original talk page posts. Also, I expected someone to respond after I reverted not revert again. I was fearful it would turn into an edit war. Sorry about that. I am not normally confrontational. I would be happy to work with you on how to address the tour update after this. Rightfully, all of the tours should have their own articles. Or, there should be just one article that addresses all of the tours in it, including, the ones that are in the past. The lower level tours should have their own articles, rather than being mentions in the BFTS article, for example. Even the BFTS article needs some work, obviously, and it isn't even cited. I have been dealing with some other issues on some other rodeo articles too, so I guess it just got to me. It's not your fault, so I shouldn't have taken it out on you. But didn't you notice the other editor's edits too? Anyway, I hope we can deal with the issue of the 25th tour constructively together going forward. Thanks for replying, I feel better, and I hope my reply makes you feel better. dawnleelynn^(talk) 01:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. We both made mistakes. It was not my intention to ruin any articles. I just wanted to update what was new with the PBR. I am a lifelong bull riding and rodeo fan and I wanted to make sure the information on Wikipedia was correct for fans and otherwise to look up. I’m new to this, and still have a lot to learn. Thanks, again. Uricarrillo94 (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm glad to meet another rodeo fan. I've been here awhile editing rodeo articles, especially bull riding, on Wikipedia. Can you take a breather for a minute from editing articles with the tour name, especially replacing the words in articles "Built Ford Tough Series" with "Unleash the Beast Tour"? I notice that the PBR is also calling it the 25th Anniversary Tour as well. That's why I was not yet making any changes in articles until I found out what exactly was going on. I didn't even notice this Beast wording until the PBR articles came out from the event this weekend. Plus, again we don't want to be doing a search and replace of one tour name with the other. That's not how it works in an encyclopedia. You change the wording in the PBR article to talk about the BFTS series as the previous tour, you don't rename the old tour name with the new tour name. And I'm not exactly sure that is how the tour is supposed to be referred to. Check this page, for example: [1]. It refers to the tour as the 25th Anniversary Tour. Also, you are not using any citations with your updates, that is why others, like White Arabian Filly are reverting your edits. They think the edits are vandalism because there is no supporting citation and they are not familiar with the fact that the PBR is changing the tour name. If you need any help, I'll be happy to assist you in any any at all. I'm here to act as a steward for the rodeo pages since I've been editing here for quite awhile. Just ask. I'd also like a little time to research the tour name, are you writing an article? I saw somewhere the tour name as a couple different things. It's important to get that right before moving it to mainspace. It's going to be linked to lots of times in the future, just like the current BFTS article is. Please consider carefully, thanks so much. dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello there. Again, I would like to apologize for any inconvenience. I visit the PBR website almost daily. I thought the top tour was still going to be called the Built Ford Tough Series after 2017, however a few weeks after that season ended, new articles appeared on the website in which the top tour was being referred to as the “Premier Series”. I thought: Either the top tour will now be called the Premier Series, or it’s in the process of getting a new title sponsor. I also saw the article last week in which PBR CEO Sean Gleason addresses the tour as the 25th anniversary tour. Then I thought that the top tour would not receive a new title sponsor until 2019. However, the day of the first round of the NYC top tour event, a new article appeared in which a contract was signed with Monster Energy, and that the company was to become the title sponsor for the big league tours in the US, Canada, Brazil and Australia. At least in the US, the tour is called the 25th Unleash the Beast Tour. So, I hope this helps. I will definitely be taking a break from editing here. I don’t want editors to think I am causing an editing war. That has never been my intention. Starting any kind of war is something I want to stay far away from. Thanks again for the information. Uricarrillo94 (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I saw some of those same things, and that's why I was confused too about the tour name. I never meant you too feel this way that you had to take a break from editing Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. If that's what I did I feel bad. I know how I felt when I first started editing and I could have never gotten serious about being an editor too if it wasn't for the editor who started mentoring me in the beginning. I am only here because of her even know, she still helps me with policy and conflicts. I definitely feel I was acting more than just what a good steward of an article should do, so I am sorry. I actually really have been hoping for more activity here from somewhere who knows a lot about bull riding. I can teach editing to newcomers with bull knowledge, and learn more about bull riding from them. I hope you will reconsider or at least come back soon. I would be happy to learn more about bull riding from you cause it sounds like you know quite a bit about it, since you actively check it every day... and I know a lot about editing now. I have edited every bull article here or written it. But that doesn't mean it can't be improved. Best wishes! dawnleelynn^(talk) 05:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Uricarrillo94 I did some looking around on this tour name issue and finally found the following article that explains what the tour name is. See this article from the PBR which says the tour name to use is officially this "PBR 25TH UNLEASH THE BEAST TOUR". This web page [2]. Of course, take note that Wikipedia is very sensitive to the case issue and every editor who knows policy will edit the uppercase of this down to lowercase. I don't know why the article put this in upppercase to begin with, it's not realistic. So this is the tour name the PBR has chosen but we would go forward without complete uppercasing as follows: PBR 25th Unleash the Beast tour. I have seen this used in some other PBR articles without the uppercasing as well. So, the uppercasing was used in this article simply to make a one-time point. Also the word tour at the end would be needed sometimes and sometimes not depending on the usage. dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I also checked out the finalized 2017 media kit online, and it changed the name of the Built Tough Ford section to the Premier Series, which is something you had mentioned. The Premier Series is supposed to cover all of the elite tours when they want to talk about them all at once. The previous media kit still refers to the BFTS. Just an FYI, because I had not come across the term before. I know they are not trying to be confusing, but nontheless it has been. dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Comment: I"m a little late to this party. The question I have is whether the "Unleash the Beast" is exactly the same as the old BFTS or if it's a total revamp. It would be nice if we could have a "generic" name for this whatever-it-is tour, move the article name once (and fix all the incoming links, which IS a pain in the you-know-what, but sometimes necessary) and call it good. If it's basically the same thing (the elite competitors' series), then a move is probably worth further discussion, but if it's totally different, then... bleech. If Unleash the Beast is new, it needs its own article and I would put a link to the new tour article from the old one and vice-versa. Probably the best comparison is some renamed horse races. For example, the Zenyatta Stakes used to be called the "Lady's Secret Stakes" but it is exactly the same race, just renamed. On the other hand, the Pegasus World Cup is a totally different race from the Donn Handicap, but took the same slot in the racing schedule. So, here, the threshold question is to figure out if the new tour is just a rename of the old one or if it is a whole different thing. Montanabw^(talk) 17:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Montanabw Uricarrillo94

Okay, thanks montanabw for your comment, these are really good points. Again, this PBR article will explain the difference between the BFTS and the new tour, which is shown in a different font to emphasize its name. [3]. The PBR 25TH UNLEASH THE BEAST TOUR.

Here is something else that might be helpful. In the 2016 Media Guide, the elite tour is referred to as the Built Ford Tough Series. See [4]. But in the new 2018 Media Guide it is referred to as the Premier Series. See [5]. It seems as though the PBR now wants to refer to all of their elite series that they have had and now have as "Premier Series" from now on. We could possibly do the same thing as far as having one article that all of the different tours can link to while still having their own names in those articles. Or something similar to that. The BFTS spans 17 years and has almost 150 links. It also exists in hundreds of PBR articles and newspaper articles. We can't do away with it altogether or there would be confusion in articles about bulls and riders who completed from 2003-2017. Anyway, I am putting the information out there for consideration. As far as whether the tours are the same, I haven't seen any announcements of differences in the tour except the name, so far. dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Montanabw And now I come across this PBR article [6] written yesterday in which the author refers to the tour as the "PBR 25th: Unleash the Beast Series". It is confusing. Now I see why the IP editor of the PBR article changed my edit to this. But it wasn't helpful to me because they did not provide a source. And I had a source there for the use of the tour name I had provided. Anyway, it is still hard to say for sure what the new tour name actually is. I'm going to look around the PBR site some more. dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Sometimes, even though we cannot do original research (per WP:NOR), when it's a mess like this, sometimes one can call up the organization and just talk to someone. Usually they can refer you to something like a press kit or something that will give you the sourcing you need to have accurate material. The though that occurs to me with all of this is NASCAR, which is similar to the PBR in its extensive use of sponsorships. Might be worth surfing their articles to see how they have addressed changing names and if their competition series are the same races with changing names or not. My thought at present,though, is to create a small article on Unleash the Beast, cross-link between that article and this one, and then if it is clear that they have an "elite series" that just changes names, then the two articles could later be merged. Montanabw^(talk) 19:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

I just saw this tweet on the PBR Twitter feed where they posted an embedded video of a elite series rider and referred to the series as the "PBR Premier series" at this tweet [7]. I can count four different ways they are referring to the current tour in 2018 in addressing the public with the name. dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Regardless of the year, the PBR Premier Series is the same regardless of the Built Ford Tough or the Monster Energy sponsorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:a000:ee47:7c00:6233:4bff:fe08:f41c (talk • contribs) 2606:a000:ee47:7c00:6233:4bff:fe08:f41c (UTC)

You obviously have not fully considered the all of the ramifications of what you are trying to do. There are over 150 links to this article that when clicked bring readers expecting to read about the BFTS. The BFTS will go on in existing WP articles and new articles that will be written. There are 1,000s of PBR press and feature articles that mention this series, as well as online newspaper and magazines articles. There are 100s of articles that can be written about bull riders, bulls, and other subjects that touch on them or where they competed during the BFTS. It lasted for 17 years. When someone reads an article that talks about the BFTS, they need to find that wording in the article on Wikipedia too. When they come to this article, they need to be able to read about the BFTS. Yes, it's no longer the current sponsor. But this is not some darn blog; it's an encyclopedia. It's history. We preserve the articles and we do not overwrite them with new information. We will be documenting the BFTS for a long time. You should never be revising articles such that their history is lost. If you are doing that, you are sorely mistaken. And, it is not just names and numbers. It's something that is threaded throughout the documentation on Wikipedia, PBR, and other sources. I'm a professional technical writer, so I know what I'm talking about. For example, I would never take an article named "PBR World Cup" and try to change it to "PBR Global Cup" within the article while the article name stays the same. It's two different names. The fact that you did that makes it obvious you don't know what you are doing. Changing an article to make it mean something else is a big deal and not undertaken lightly. Now please do not change this article again. This is the BFTS article and it should not be rewritten to mean something else entirely within the article. And no, the article name should not be changed either. If you revise it again, I will take this issue up another rung on the ladder. You do not even have any sources for the changes you are making. If I take this to a resolution board, it will easily fall in my favor. dawnleelynn^(talk) 06:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

My thought as an outside observer is that this article should be moved to the new name of the series if the series has been renamed. Then, Built Ford Tough Series will function as a redirect to the new title. This would be just like how Winston Cup or Sprint Cup Series redirect to Monster Energy NASCAR Series. The "150 links to this article" would follow to the newly named article.

We shouldn't make separate articles on the different iterations of this series if it's still just one continued series, albeit under different names. I fully protected this article for a week so that people can discuss proposed changes rather than reverting. only (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

And I just found this press release which verifies that it is a continuation of the series, now under a new name. Our article should reflect that like the NASCAR examples are handled. only (talk) 22:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Another reason I reverted the edit in the Professional Bull Riders and this article, besides it being unsourced, is that is was inaccurate. It stated "The PBR 25th: Unleash the Beast, which began in 1994 , is the elite series of the PBR." Well, no that tour name did not begin 1994. The Bud Light Cup Series began in 1994. The editor even wrote a comment in the article instructing me not to change this sentence. It was totally unsourced, and I have dozens of sources to prove it is wrong.[[8]]

Also, edits were made in the PBR World Cup certainly show that the same two IPs tried to take the same tact there, trying to take an event that was discontinued 9 years ago, and remake it into an event called the PBR Global Cup which was created last year, as though the new event was a continuance of the old event, just a name change. But that is simply not true. [[9]] doesn't mention the old event. And, these edits were also made without sources. Immediately after posting a message in the move name discussion accusing me of deception, that same IP immediately went to the world cup article and made an unsourced edit there, once again attempting to stuff the unrelated event in there.dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

They also kept adding the sponsor Real Time Pain Relief to the Velocity Tour. Velocity Tour is a lower level tour name that stands on its own without a sponsor name. It did so when it was the BlueDef Velocity Tour, and it can do so now. The Pro Touring Division also stands on its own without any sponsor name. It avoids so many headaches from having different names. Unfortunately, this was not possible with the various elite tour names. It also follows the policy of avoiding sponsor names when we can. We don't call the National Finals Rodeo the Wrangler National Finals Rodeo like they do on their web site [10] for the same reason. See WP:NOTADVERTISING. If we did, it would be a lot of search and replace if the NFR changed their sponsor. Wrangler has only been the sponsor for around 12 years. Additionally, what a concept, we don't have to actually mirror them perfectly in all things. We can make decisions for documentation purposes and for our audience. Anyway, I actually tried to use what I could from their last edit in my last revision while maintaining the accuracy. I can see that it needs some more work, though. Some of the text does need to be clearer on how the tours follow each other, I don't actually have an issue with that wording so much. But I still think saying that the new tour name started in 1994 is and will be confusing to readers. It would even be preferable to say that the Premier Series started in 1994 then the sponsor who started an partnership in 2018 did. dawnleelynn^(talk) 20:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

A little note about press releases. Sometimes you have to use a little discernment. Usually, you need to wait until you see the real enactments because what they say in a press release is sometimes a little preliminary. It's a press release, it doesn't always line up exactly with what they actually put into development. And here are two examples: First, [11] Here, they are saying the new tour name is the PBR 25th Anniversary Tour. And here [12] they are saying it is PBR 25TH UNLEASH THE BEAST TOUR. So really, would they mean to do a tour name that was all caps? Doubtful.

Dekimasu Hi, Dekimasu, thanks for the page move closure. Only hasn't responded to anything since January 27. I was wondering if you would consider removing the full page protection on this article. Montanabw left a courteous note about it several days ago with no response to the point that it was really more for serious edit warring - not a case like mine where we didn't even break the 3 revert rule. Appreciate your consideration, dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

I understand your eagerness to edit the article, but the protection is already set to expire later today, so I'd suggest waiting for the period to finish up; this will also make it easier to react if there are subsequent problems. Dekimasuよ! 06:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Dekimasu Thanks for replying. Actually it's set for 22:30 which won't be until almost evening Saturday and that's half my weekend already. But that's ok, it's par for the course around here. dawnleelynn^(talk) 07:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Series suggestion

dawnleelynn, Montanabw - I'm of the mind that a series template should be created (like the one we use for US Presidents) so our readers can easily see/access the major PBR tours, series events, and world championships. Your thoughts, and do we have a template editor who can create it? ^{Atsme📞📧} 15:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)  

Atsme Do you have an example you can link? We have some of that in Professional Bull Riders. White Arabian Filly is an exceptional template editor. She created the bovine template for me, as well as many others. Thanks for the idea! You are always so thoughtful though. dawnleelynn^(talk) 16:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes ma'am - Hillary_Clinton, Donald Trump - the series template is just below the infobox. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Ooh, I like it! Would we create one, for example, saying this article is part of a series of Professional Bull Riders World Champion Bull Riders and Professional Bull Riders World Champion Bulls, etc., and others as such are in the PBR article? dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Exactly. Needs to be planned out ahead of time so we'll know what needs to be in the template. I think RexxS may be a template creator, but I know for certain Captain Picard's biggest fan Whistle britches is quite capable as well. Maybe we can talk one of them into helping. ^{Atsme📞📧} 23:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I can probably do it, though I'd welcome help from either of the users you pinged above. I can probably get to it tomorrow. I'm about to log off right now and eat supper! 🍜 — Preceding unsigned comment added by White Arabian Filly (talk • contribs)

Atsme I have started an aside article to the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association where I am listing all of the champions and award winners. When we are done with PBR, we might want to do series templates for the PRCA too. Just a suggestion. It's in my sandbox here Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association Champions. After all, you are the one who knows the most about them around here. But I don't think you would have to do that much, mostly just check things for accuracy. Also as an FYI, I am planning per discussion with montanabw to break out the champions in the PBR article into an aside article too. dawnleelynn^(talk) 02:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Wow!! What a busy little bee you turned out to be. Soooo proud of you! I'll do what I can as time permits. ^{Atsme📞📧} 02:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• Atsme I wouldn't mind doing it at all. Just let me know what you come up with, and I'll happily whip one up. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Atsme Ok, I found time to look at this today. But I'm not sure how this works, I probably just need a push in the right direction to get started. I need to ask for what to be parameters... dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Off the top of my head, start with the most notable PBR tours, and World Championship events. It can grow from there. ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, that's good. But what do I have to ask the template editors for? For Clinton, there's just her and mostly a bunch of articles about her that are linked. So am I using the PBR article and linking the three other articles about the PBR? See Category:Professional Bull Riders. Or were we going to break out articles? Not sure? dawnleelynn^(talk) 21:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I'd probably name it Professional Bull Riding Association (PBR), and the first sub-heading would be PBR Tours...then list the tours...the 2nd sub-heading would be World Championships...list them. Gather all related articles and organize them so you'll know how best to subdivide them into a navbox. I'm thinking MPants at work can help in that regard. It can always grow from there, but the main thing is to link all the associated-articles to the navbox. ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok, then they don't have to be an article to list them, they can be a section in an article? I just gathered all articles. There's four. Unless you count bulls and bull riders. But, I am going to break out of all the lists of awards from the main PBR article into a companion list. Then there will be five articles. I can do that pretty quickly. I just completed an overhaul on the PBR article and now it's all cited and all the lists are corrected and cited. I even added a list from a new source I got direct from the PBR. Plus, there's that article in my sandbox, which I can't do anything about until the block is removed on the BFTS article. I think that block comes off around Saturday. Thanks for helping some more. dawnleelynn^(talk) 21:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

• What you're looking for is a navigation template, the kind that goes at the bottom, similar to {{Jim Butcher}}, but for this rodeo series, right? In that case what I need, really, is just a list of all the articles that would include this template, preferably sorted by what the subject is (specific or reoccurring events, awards, notable people, notable bulls, dedicated venues, etc, etc). ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Well, what she was suggesting was a series template that goes below the infobox, like the kind used for Hilary Clinton or Donald Trump. See links above near the very top. Thanks... dawnleelynn^(talk) 22:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Atsme, sorry to overwhelm you with so many questions yesterday. Actually, that last question was it. Just wanted to know if it okay to link to a section in an article or not. Wanted to know how I should break out the lists of awardees in the main PBR article. I can make up some of the required parameters like we talked about. A couple will have to be placeholders until the page move request and the full protection of this article are over, though. Thanks a bunch! dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you can wikilink to an exact section. Another thought - you should probably start an outline in your sandbox for the PBR Series template and be thinking about what you want to use for the image, too. ^{Atsme📞📧} 12:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Atsme Hey, thanks for that last reply. I've been mulling everything over in my mind. Did you see the page move request was closed in our favor, btw? Thanks for your support. Yes, a sandbox outline is a great idea, I will do that. The full block page protection on this article wears off late today too. As far as an image, I have all of those pictures I took at Cheyenne Frontier Days. Obviously, I can't repeat the PBR logo, LOL. So, I have a few changes to make this weekend that will split articles up but then there will be more PBR articles, which is a good thing. Ok, I will layout in the sandbox...I will post a link to it here when I have something worth looking at. Thanks so much! :) dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

• Atsme MPants at work White Arabian Filly Hi there, I don't know who settled on doing the series template, since MPants found out it wasn't a navigation template. At any rate, I have finished doing all the article work on the PBR articles. All the articles that needed changed or moved have been done and everything is stable now. So, I just finished creating a possible layout (first draft) of the articles for the series template in a sandbox in my userspace. Atsme, could you take a look at that for me? Thanks! it's at User:Dawnleelynn/PBR Series. dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, I thought you were talking about a nav template, but a series template is certainly do-able, as well. I just need to get the info that's going into it. Basically, I need a list of all the pages that will be going into it. Preferably by type as I mentioned above, but a plain list would work. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 18:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

MPants at work Well, that's what the article in my sandbox was that I linked in my last reply. I listed out the links under headings. I didn't know if Atsme wanted to see if first. But it's there if you want to see and let me know if that's what you are expecting. It's by type as you prefer. The last type "Professional Bull Riders Statistics" might be iffy, tell me how you think that content looks. It was recently created and needs polished. Thanks! dawnleelynn^(talk) 20:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Dawnleelynn: I'm popping in here, firing off a response and popping out so quick I completely missed that! (For a smart guy like me, I'm awfully dumb...) Yes, that should be good. I'll make a template (probably tonight, after I put my kids to bed) and post a link to it here so you guys can give me input on any changes that might be needed. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@MPants at work: Hey, if you are dumb, then count me in too. I miss stuff too, LOL! Hey, we are not in a rush, but appreciate your enthusiasm for sure. Thanks so much! I'm trying to settle on an image for the template. I uploaded around 200 photographs to Commons from attending slack at Cheyenne Frontier Days last summer. I also have some from previous summers. Something neutral must be here. Anyway, look forward to seeing it. dawnleelynn^(talk) 21:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Atsme I was perusing WP Commons and came across this file which was actually taken at a PBR event and it's actually available for use without any fair use complication. What do you think? [13] Nothing from my CFD pictures is proving to be right for this series template. dawnleelynn^(talk) 22:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Good find, use it - I'll try to get us some photos during the rodeo here. I actually may have some in my archives. I'll check to see after I wrap-up some RL business that needs tending. ^{Atsme📞📧} 00:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

• See Template:Built Ford Tough series. I picked the background color based on the red used in this logo. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 03:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  • @MPants at work: Okay, let me first say that it looks great. The types and lists are all what I laid out in my sandbox. But, because this conversation happened to take place on the Built Ford Tough Series article, you must have gotten the impression that it was the name of the template series. But they are two different kinds of series. And the BFTS series is the name of the elite tour that the Professional Bull Riders used from 2003 until 2017. The current tour name now is actually Unleash the Beast Series. The series that we are creating for the articles is the Professional Bull Riders Series. Now maybe that means that all the types don't need Professional Bull Riders in front of them, I don't know. This is my first time doing a series template. But the main level is Professional Bull Riders. You might notice that the Built Ford Tough Series is listed in the PBR Tours section. That's where it belongs. Sorry for the misunderstanding. That's what Atsme and I were talking about, I thought. That's an interesting image; I've never seen that before with the BFTS in it. Okay, thanks. I will peruse the template some more to make sure it's what we needed, that I asked for everything, etc. Thanks a bunch for doing this; it's really great...there's only that minor issue I see so far. dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Okay, take two: Template:Professional Bull Riders series. It's the same shade of red as in the logo at the bottom now, so I left it alone. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

You are sooo good at this, MPants, and Dawnlee is doing such an excellent job organizing these events!! My only suggestion would be to make the red banner at the top bigger, fit the PBRA logo inside it on the left, and make the banner text white on that deep red background: This article is part of a series about professional bull riding. If it works, good, if not, I apologize for the extra work. Wow - watching this whole thing come to life is such a treat. Thank you!! ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

MPants Atsme I was just finishing up my comments when I saw that you posted yours, Atsme. That all sounds terrific. Are we cool on having the logo in the article twice? Perhaps that's customary though. Once in the infobox and once in the series template. Maybe that's cool cause they will be different sizes. Mpants, thank you for fixing it. It's completely my bad for not making it the series title clear. If you could just make one more adjustment, I think we are really close. I took at look at these sites as part of my review. These two sites list the Rookie of the Year in close proximity with the other champions: PBR champions [14] and the PBR World Finals web site history page [15] and they show the four champions considered the most important, which are World Champion, World Finals Event Winner, World Champion Bull, and Rookie of the Year. I'm going to move the Rookie of the Year list up to the Champion section in the PBR article. So, if you could move it up to the Champions section in the template, that would be great. I would add it before World Champion Bull, I think. Thanks for making the changes caused by me not defining the parameters well. It looks so cool. I'm going to love it in the articles when it's 100 percent. dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

No, not two of the same logo - see this template: Template:Hillary_Clinton_series - in our case the logo would be inside the box, or leave it as is, only bigger and make the PRBA logo smaller. ^{Atsme📞📧} 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, so let me be clear here, since I seem to be otherwise ridiculously confused. (It's all the cooperation going on here, you see. I'm used to hammer & tongs arguments that frequently spill over into WP:ANI and WP:AE. All this working-together and getting-along is strange and frightening to a grumpy ole bastard like me. ) You want to remove the image currently at the top left and replace it with the PBR logo. You want to make the red background a darker shade than that used in the logo (which is fine, as we're an encyclopedia, not an ad firm), and make the text white (and possibly bold, for clarity). Does that sum it up? (I've already moved the rookie of the year list to the champions section.) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

• Atsme MPants Right, I know there are different pictures inside the series template. But in the article, like I said, the logo is used once in the infobox template and once in the series template. The Hilary Clinton article has different pictures of her in the infobox than in the series template. I really even question how we are using the PBR logo at all. It wasn't me who put it in the PBR article. The one in the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association was removed for copyright violation. The one in the ProRodeo Hall of Fame is questionable as well. When I created the Bull Riding Hall of Fame article, some one tried to stuff a copyright violation logo in there that montanabw and I definitely agreed we needed to remove. It was already marked as a copyright issue. There is questionable fair use for all of these logos. For the file in the PBR article, [16]], the information is given that they believe it may qualify as fair use. See the link for details and let me know what you think. I have been meaning to get around to this anyway. Wow, I just tried to publish and some one beat me to it again, LOL! dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

That is a good question. Using it on the page is fine, as it's minimal use. But adding it to the series template could create a problem when that template gets put on multiple pages. (By the way, I made the changes I mentioned, take a look). I think starting a thread at Wikipedia:Copyright problems might be the way to go. We could get some community input, and somebody watching that page is bound to have some good insight. One thing which I've done before which might be the easiest path is to email them and ask them for permission. Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries contains a boilerplate form which can be modified to suit the occasion, and which -once filled out by the appropriate party and sent to the volunteer response team- permits us to use the image. In the previous occasions on which I've done it, the companies were only too happy to get their images used on WP (that being the whole point of a logo), though they often required a bit of hand-holding through the process. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Atsme MPants Okay, I have to say this first of all. Wow! With the newest changes on both your parts, it just pops! It looks so professional and perfect now, I just love it. Regarding the use of the logo, I am curious to hear what Atsme has to say, since I have almost no experience with these suggestions. Again, it's really just looking right what I hoped for. dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

PERFECT!! Thank you, thank you, MPants!! I'm checking on the fair use issue now. May take me a few but will let you know. ^{Atsme📞📧} 19:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

MPants at work, dawnleelynn - please see Wikipedia:Logos and the trademarked image's file page where I just added the trademark notice. I think we could probably add a small notice under the logo in the series template stating: PBR logo is protected by US trademark laws. For extra insurace, I've sent an email to PBR for specific permission to use the logo in the series template. ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Atsme, MPants at work Well, that doesn't sound so bad regarding what you did re the logo, Atsme. Of course, I didn't actually see what you did, just the results. And I highly appreciate your efforts Atsme. Funny to think I didn't even know what series templates were a couple weeks ago. Thank you both so much, the results are terrific and I think they will make the intended articles look so much more professional. dawnleelynn^(talk) 00:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Atsme, MPants at work I gather you are both aware by now that last night Hammersoft removed the PBR logo from the series template. Looks like we are really going to need the PBR's permission to use this logo in these various articles. I have seen this particular editor remove graphics from articles before. Anyway, I was right to worry about it I guess, not that I wanted to be right, mind you. Will wait to hear from you Atsme on that response to your email. Fingers crossed! :) dawnleelynn^(talk) 17:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Here's a couple ideas. First: I could draw a silhouette of a bullrider in action and we could use that as a sort of substitute logo (Yes, I can draw). Second: we could locate a PBR logo that doesn't have any image elements to it (such logos cannot be copyrighted, as arrangements of letters -even with original font faces- is generally not considered sufficient to establish copyright). Third: I could do something stylistic with the text to avoid the need for images. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

MPants at work Well sure, it's good to have some back up plans in case the PBR doesn't give permission. And I'm not surprised you can draw. But it is cool. I wish I could draw sometimes. Your ideas sound good. Let's see what Atsme says. PBR probably isn't working over the weekend, at least not the office people who would handle this issue. :) dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

dawnleelynn, not sure if you already have this info but if not, you may find it helpful when adding to the template. Actually, the bullriding image has the PBR logo in it. Maybe we could move it to the top banner of the template and be done with it. ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

dawnleelynn, Oh yes, I have links to all four sections of that 2017 Media Guide as well as the 2016, 2015, and 2014 Media Guides, which I have used to expand the PBR articles as well as using some archive links in the Wayback Machine and a book from the library written by the PBR about their organization. The main PBR article was poorly cited but it is completely cited now. And expanded. But thank you! You couldn't have known that. I suppose you emailed the PBR using one of the emails therein? Or were given this guide by the PBR? Are you feeling like their answer will be to the negative? dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Take a look now. I did the silhouette thing. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Aren't you the handiest, most awesome creative talent to have at our disposal!!! My only suggestion would be to lighten the silhouette a shade or two, or the background for a bit more contrast. ^{Atsme📞📧} 22:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Lightening it a small amount would make for far less contrast. I suppose I could swap it out for white, but I'm not sure that would look very good. I could make it look like a metallic emblem, I suppose. That might make it stand out, and be a little more reminiscent of the PBR logo. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Nah - just lighten the maroon background a tad or frame the bull and just lighten the bkgd ever so slightly. No to white or metallic. ^{Atsme📞📧} 22:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

I just tried a metallic version. Take a look. I think it's a little bit unclear. I can lighten the background if you don't like this. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Like the black silhouette bull better...I'm thinking you can just lighten the bkgd a shade so it's easier to see the outline of the bull. ^{Atsme📞📧} 23:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay. I reverted to the black silhouette and lightened the background. I also changed the header text color to black to match the image better. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 01:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I've been offline most of the day. I checked in about half an hour ago for a few seconds and saw the metallic one. And I saw the first black one and now the one you just added back that's black. I prefer the black one. If the PBR answers in the affirmative this week, I do like that logo in there. Let me know when we should start using the template in the articles. Thanks to you both so much for your hard work. There's no way I could ever have done a series template on my own. dawnleelynn^(talk) 01:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

I actually did get a positive response. When I laid out the hoops he had to jump through, he said something along the line that he didn't realize it required an advanced college degree to get a logo licensed on Wikipedia (and he thanked everyone at WP and those working on the article for thinking of PBR). *lol* Let's hope he can do what needs to be done to get it licensed under (CC-By-ND 2.0) ^{Atsme📞📧} 03:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Oh, well, I can't say I'm surprised that procedure is complicated and not surprised at his response either. It's nice about the positive response, though, seriously. I hope they do like the PBR article. I'll be interested to hear if he follows through or not, either way. I guess WP has to make it complicated, naturally. LOL I've never done any of this before, so it's new to me. Good for you trying though, I truly do appreciate it very much. dawnleelynn^(talk) 04:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

The issue is that it's an existing image published without a specified license. It's presumed to be non-free (just like all copyrightable material), so WP staff (and us editors) have to do a lot of documentation to get it made clear that it's no longer non-free, and also that it is expressly free. Usually, the copyright owner's involvement doesn't need to be more complex than filling out and emailing a declaration, but in some cases it can get really awkward, such as when the copyright is owned by a business with more than a few employees. I've gone through this before, and I don't envy you, Atsme. I've even done this from the copyright owner's side (I was involved in a business a while back that, upon closing down, decided to release our images into the public domain, including two which were on en.wp under fair-use) and I don't envy the PBR rep, either. lol ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Amen to that!! I'm an OTRS member where there's never a dull moment. I just didn't have enough backlogs to deal with in my life. ^{Atsme📞📧} 15:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't know you were an OTRS member. That's awesome. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 27 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. For the time being I have created a redirect from the proposed title to this page, and this can be revisited if a new title seems to become the most common term. Dekimasuよ! 02:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

---

Built Ford Tough Series → PBR 25th Unleash the Beast Tour – Per sources and press releases, the series is now known as PBR 25th Unleash the Beast Tour. This is the same series under a new name. It is considered a continuation of the Built Ford Tough Series. Moving sports articles to reflect their new sponsor names is common practice. Examples include Winston Cup and Nextel Cup redirecting to Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series; D-League redirecting to NBA G League; and various college football bowl games, tennis tournaments, and golf tournaments who experienced title sponsor changes. With this in mind, the article should be moved, and the text should be updated to include the new naming and the history of the tour. only (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

This is correct. The BFTS became Unleash the Beast. Editing has been made by some to deceive people that the PBR premier tour is new in 2018 when it has been the same, just a new title sponsor.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:a000:ee47:7c00:6233:4bff:fe08:f41c (talk • contribs) 2606:a000:ee47:7c00:6233:4bff:fe08:f41c (UTC)

• Temporary oppose on the grounds that this is a one-year-only change and the article may be better of named "PBR Elite Series" or some other permanent, long-term solution. This issue is being effectively discussed and the better solution would be to create a new, separate article on Unleash the Beast that, along with this one, could be merged at a later date when the PBR figures out that they need a permanent name for this event. Also, as noted above, over 150 incoming links will need to be fixed. Montanabw^(talk) 01:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose Uricarrillo94, montanabw, and I were discussing how to handle the new tour name constructively in this talk page until an anonymous user 2606:a000:ee47:7c00:6233:4bff:fe08:f41c started making driveby, unsourced edits to the article, changing the meaning of the article. I asked for page protection because that's what one normally does. Here we are, not my idea. But, if you are going to retitle an article, at least use the right title. It should be "25th PBR: Unleash the Beast". See the Standings on the web site: [17] or a recent feature article like [18]. This "solution" leaves out that "Premier Series" might be the better title (doesn't expire after a year). The move request now is bad timing, anyway editing is not ready or wanted for this direction.

I had already written a long explanation on the ramifications of handling this article as simply a tour name change earlier in the talk page, so please read that. There are the number of links to the article, like montanabw pointed out. This is not automatically similar to the NASCAR or other sports solution proffered. I have uncovered numerous sources which I had been in the process of using to update and expand the section on the tours in the Professional Bull Riders (also hit by anon user) article and get it fully cited, then this article was next on the list. I was planning to use the new sources to add the information I found to these articles which would make things clearer.

So, the BFTS lasted 17 years, which means there are 1,000s of PBR feature and press releases that mention it, 100s of online magazines and newspaper articles, DVDs, merchandise, you name it, it's all over. Lots of Wikipedia articles exist, but also potentially many more to be written yet, on champion bulls and bull riders and other performers who are notable and qualify for an article, which I consider requires a careful, thoughtful solution in my experience in 20 years as a technical writer in software documentation which included lots of experience in versioning. Also, the recognition of an anonymous editor emboldened another troll to create a new IP and post to this requested moves discussion accusing me of deception which is highly untrue. At any rate, editors will weigh in on this matter. But I'm the one who edits here for the long term and will deal with the fall out.

So, an additional bit. I worked hard on this even before this became an issue. And I had sources and content written up in offline places. It affected this article, the PBR article and had the possibility of a new article. Since this article is fully blocked I created a mock-up in a sandbox. Professional Bull Riders Tours gives a better idea how much content there really is, but it does need polish. And tables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawnleelynn (talk • contribs) 15:10, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

Why not do a simple move which takes the history with it and leave a redirect on the moved page to the new name? Redirects are economical.^{Atsme📞📧} 19:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose - Ok, I get it now - what needs to happen is this...each year's event ^{tour in this case, as it comprises individual events 15:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)} needs to be named whatever the name is/was at the time. ^{Atsme📞📧} 20:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose for several reasons. A) This is a one-year change, so we would just have to move it again next year if moved. B) The references almost all refer to the BFTS, so some user unfamiliar with rodeo might be inclined to remove them--or that could cause problems in the event this ever goes to DYK or something. C) I'm with Montanabw that we can move it to something else when we figure out what the PBR is going to call it permanently, but moving it now means we'd just have to move again in a year. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 19:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced content to add in future

172.254.85.226 You know, actually, how it should work is if you have content you want to add and you can't find a source, you can add to the article's talk page. You can even ping me if you want. I'll see if I can find a source, and then you can the content to the article. Sources should be added in the same format as the rest of the sources in the article. If the sources are added in more than one type of format, though, then you can pick one. I really do want to get your intelligence into the articles as you seem very knowledgeable about the PBR. Sorry I got a little brusque in that one revert. Working together is preferable to me. Thanks again, you did make some very good edits, especially in the PBR and Bodacious articles. dawnleelynn^(talk) 18:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)