Talk:Bryan R. Cullen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Bryan R. Cullen is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Undisclosed paid edits

I have added an {{undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thaiboy43 for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Andcentra (talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring notability, due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom (talk) 13:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change to the Controversy Section

I think the last sentence of the paragraph "...where he was also revealed to be transphobic." should be changed to "...where he was also perceived to be transphobic." Seems less polemic and more true to the source. I made the change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.16.130.70 (talk) 03:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When we say he was perceived to be transphobic in the email chain, I think that wording is a little unclear. The source doesn't say the email was perceived as transphobic; the one specific allegation of transphobia stemmed from a cartoon he posted, which didn't have anything to do with the email chain except that someone brought up that cartoon in their email reply to him. The perception of transphobia came from the posting of the cartoon, not the email. If we are going to talk about transphobia, could we be clear that in the email chain, two doctoral candidates said that he had engaged in transphobic behavior in the past?

I'm noticing that this incident is at least starting to be picked up by reliable sources outside of Duke, but I think we should still be careful that our coverage doesn't grow out of proportion to the amount of coverage the incident received in reiable sources. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]