Talk:Broken Boy Soldiers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Early listeners? "Compared"? NME? Alt-F4

With an edit summary like that, I think I'd like more explanation for your revertion of material clearly labeled as someone's opinion but fleshing out what would otherwise be a rediculosly small article. Robdurbar 09:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Backward Message

There is a backward message, I'm sure, on the last track (Blue Veins). Anyone think this is worth mentioning?

PS: I don't have a sound recorder, so I can't decode the message.--XXXtylerXXX 13:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Backwards Part in the song "Blue Veins"

I took a look at that backwards part can't make out what it says. All you do is convert the song to a .wav, then you take that .wav and open it in Microsoft’s sound recorder and they have a reverse option, then you save it. I have the song backwards and when it is backwards the part that is not reversed is 1:08 seconds in until 1:27 in. Hope someone can figure out what he says!

Fair use rationale for Image:Broken Boy Soldiers.jpg

Image:Broken Boy Soldiers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review section

I've removed the link to the Robert Christgau review (link), not because he gave it a low 2 star review but because the link takes you to a one sentence "review" which not only misspells the album but only (very, very) vaguely refers to two songs. Anyone disagree? --220.238.76.212 (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]