Jump to content

Talk:Broad Run High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBroad Run High School was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Amount of citations

[edit]

I do like the fact that citations are put in the article and they do show the integrity of the article and why Broad Run has a GA rating. However, it seems that nearly every sentence has a citation next to it in some paragraphs. Do any of you think that some citations can be removed or at least that some areas seem to be with great deals of footnotes? 20176 04:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been dwelling on that for weeks now, and have the same impression. However, the Manual of Style is pretty specific and supports lots of cites for these reasons —
  1. To credit a source for providing useful information and to avoid claims of plagiarism.
  2. To show that your edit isn't original research.
  3. To ensure that the content of articles is credible and can be checked by any reader or editor.
  4. To help users find additional reliable information on the topic.
  5. To improve the overall credibility and authoritative character of Wikipedia.
  6. To reduce the likelihood of editorial disputes, or to resolve any that arise.
I think we're mostly focused on 3, 5, 4, 2, and 6 here, in that order (or something close to it). So adequate citing is important. But I do think it interferes with readability. Consequently, I've been doing research, mostly reading Featured articles and comparing them to BR's. I'd like to get it to the point very soon of having a peer review so we can nominate it for FA status. The level of citing on FAs varies considerably. I think one issue we have is that of necessity there are quite a few statistics in the article. Possibly what we can do is move some of the specific cites from the Footnote section to the Sources section. These citations are certainly there to demonstrate credibility, but, more practically, they are maps for future editors to update stats that will change. Locating them in the Sources section still facilitates that purpose.
First thing, though, I'm going to remove 90% of the cites in the lead. This should be no problem since everything in the lead should be supported and covered in the rest of the article (and will therefore be cited there). That will improve readability. That means some expansion of the History section, but that was needed anyways.
I'm also going to ask for some input from Appraiser: she/he did the GA review and is knowledgeable.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  : 04:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know it seems excessive, but i figure we should probably err on the side of caution. I agree with increasing readability, especially in the lead, but we need to make sure at the same time we still have all our claims verified. The lead can probably lose most of them (unless we are supposed to cite facts the first time they are stated. I am unsure if we are required to do this or not). Also, would moving some of the citations to the end of the paragraph be acceptable? I know for most scholastic papers I was taught I should cite a source at the end of the sentence in which it is being used. -- Johnny06man 14:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After reading more than a few leads, the tacit style seems to lean toward minimal citing. The expressed style for leads, however, is to only state information that is explored more fully in the article body, like any good introduction. Therefore, I think we're safe in eliminating the refs in the lead as long as we're diligent about including the supporting information and cites in the body.
Also, I think we may be able to eliminate many of the missing cites after I go through some more yearbook volumes. I'll do this as quickly as I can so we can get the article in shape for peer review.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  : 19:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Thanks again for all the hard work going through the yearbooks! -- Johnny06man 22:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. All those yearbooks are squirreled away in a secret room at BR. Fortunately, they leave it unlocked a lot.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  : 04:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long lead

[edit]

Can the lead be trimmed at all? It's a touch long for an article of this type. PhoenixTwo 23:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think most of the first paragraph can go under the History section 20176 00:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Loudoun Seal.jpg

[edit]

Image:Loudoun Seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Historical and statistical detail for Broad Run High School

[edit]

This is a high school. It can't possibly justify two articles being written on it. If the historical and statistical detail is too much detail to go into the main article, it's also too recondite to go into an article of its own. -- The Anome (talk) 13:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Location Being Automatically Entered into Facebook

[edit]

As many probably know, schools, business, etc, that one can link to their facebook page have their own facebook pages which are linked directly to its Wiki page and all of its Wiki info is used, automatically, to create its page. For this article, the Broad Run High School school page lists Broad Run as being located in Ashburn, Georgia. The facebook page can not be edited and I find no reference to it's location being in Ashburn, Georgia. Something is getting lost in translation.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Broad Run High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 17 external links on Broad Run High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broad Run High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Broad Run High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broad Run High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Broad_Run_High_School&oldid=1237415920"