Talk:British Rail Class 325

Trains: in UK / in Scotland / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks references.

If there are 16 units, how can they be numbered 325 001 to 017? Where is the 17th? Coccodrillo (talk) 12:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check your maths :-) 86.132.193.87 (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article need bringing up to date? 325001 and 002 have recently been on a road learnng trip on the West Highland Line behinf a GBRF Class 66 86.132.193.87 (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Ancestry

Yh00157 (talk · contribs) has repeatedly edited this article to change its family from British Rail Mark 3 to Networker without either citation, changing the rest of the article text, or indeed any explanation. Along with that, they have also repeatedly changed Template:Mark 3-derived and Template:Networker to suit their version of reality, again without citation, comment or anything else to justify these edits.

I notice that British Rail Mark 3 also omits Class 325, but not through any recent changes. I don't want to fix this myself, as I'm not sure I can see the full facts either way, since there is no citation to show its ancestry from the British Rail Class 319. Tim PF (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's certainly got a Networker cab, not a class 319 cab, but of course the rest of the bodywork might be based upon the mark 3 design. The usual giveaway is the corrugated roof (see this photo of a class 317, the earliest of the Mk. 3 derived EMUs; or this photo of a class 319), whereas Networker multiple-units have a smooth roof (see this photo of a class 365). --Redrose64 (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of low quality fan artwork

Do we really need these poorly drawn diagrams? We have plenty of photographs. The author gets seriously offended when they are removed, but seems unable to justify their inclusion:

Tony May (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not poorly drawn at all. Agreed it needs some fettling but serves a purpose as a general diagram. Nightfury 11:26, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vote to keep 218.215.18.16 (talk) 06:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

/Class 325 EMU/

I have made an edit on the British Rail Class 325, so please don't revert my edit! Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northernrailwaysfan (talk • contribs) 09:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want your edit reverting, you need to cite a reference to a published reliable source. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestry

Removal of low quality fan artwork

/*Class 325 EMU*/

/Class 325 EMU/