Talk:Bridge to Terabithia (2007 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Quality of referencing improved somewhat before review

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I have doubts whether the plot is really like a summary

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Consulting experts to verify length of plot is acceptable. Pmlinediter  ^Talk 09:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

   At first glance, I'd say the plot section does a fairly good job at summarizing the film. Indeed, it seems to be of appropriate length for a 90-minute movie, at least from what I've seen in similar articles. Towards the middle I found it a bit hard to keep track of the characters, but it should be fine for GA's sake. What a depressing ending, as well! Cheers, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 09:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

   Passing per Julian. Pmlinediter  ^Talk 09:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)