Talk:Breusch–Godfrey test

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Formulas seem to be broken is last version

All the formulas seem to be broken in the last version. Tried to fix it but no success. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.92.76.38 (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too technical for most readers to understand?

This article has been tagged as being too technical for most readers to understand since April of 2008. I am going through all of the articles so tagged and trying to fix them if I can and seeking help where I can't. Please point out any specific areas where we can improve the article to make it more understandable.

An alternative would be to arrive at a consensus that the article is fine the way it is, in which case I will remove the tag. I am considering doing exactly that if nobody objects in the next seven days. Guy Macon 05:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There were many additions since the tag was placed in April of 2008. I have now added a (hopefully suitable) non-technical lead. This, together with the earlier changes, might be enough. Melcombe (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks really good to me. Good work. I am going to wait seven days to see if anyone disagrees and then, if not, I will delete the tags. Guy Macon 13:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removed. Guymacon (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H1

What is H1 hypothesis in Breusch–Godfrey test? (H0 is clearly given in the article)
Is Breusch–Godfrey Chi-square test is one sided or two sided test?

I think the above two must also be given in the article. I needed and do not know these two for example. Any help will be appreciated. 212.174.38.3 (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Auxiliary Regression

On 9/24, I changed the $\widehat{Y}_{t}$ on the left-hand side of the regression equation to $\widehat{u}_{t}$ on the left-hand side of the regression equation. The auxiliary regression's dependent variables are the residuals from the initial regression of the dependent variable Y against the independent variables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.202.182.120 (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]