Talk:Boulder High School

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Boulder v. Fairview

Nice try, Boulder :) but you don't get to boast for yourself on Wikipedia. Took out mention of BHS being better than Fairview "in every way." RECON (talk) 00:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CWA section NPOV & cleanup

I have been working on the BHS entry for a bit and the biggest problem is the CWA section. I have some suggested edits that could help. I have also added a few refs and tags to help with NPOV.

(some in attendance were as young as 14)

This addition seems to have a biased tone. Also it is already assumed because Boulder High's info box mentions grades 9-12. I suggest removal for better NPOV.

The Becker quote is in the same form that has been accused as being out of context. A summary (and full text) of Becker's statements are already provided which leads me to believe that this quote is unneeded and possibly biased (context).

In particular Becker allegedly informed the students where to easily find marijuana and appeared to make fun of using a condom[citation needed]. Becker allegedly went on to encourage students to experiment with both hetero and homosexual sex and encouraged students to masturbate[citation needed].

Some NPOV cleanup needed (too hard for me). Possibly by reducing use of opinionated words like "encourage".

Mansur Gidfar and Patrick Garrett also appeared on the program Colorado 2031, hosted by local news anchor Ron Zopollo, to discuss the issue with Caplis and Silverman.

I tried to find a ref for this on the 2031 site, but the summaries are too vague. 24.8.147.178 (talk) 02:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Pudding

What is the story behind the nickname? Deeze (talk) 06:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure, as it happened before my time as a student at BHS. However, rumors have circulated that there was an incident during his days as a vice principal at the yearly "All Cultures Day". Bruce Campbell showed Chuck Norris how to roundhouse kick. (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard the name thrown around Boulder High, although i can't say i know where it came from. I'm assuming it originated before i came to the school. i would be curious if anyone did know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.1.88 (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have also heard the rumour of the all cultures day incident. The story goes that he over the course of the day consumed the majority of the pudding they had for sale. Eventually, the volunteers selling the pudding began to call him "Doctor Pudding", and the nickname stuck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.97.202.208 (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard the nickname recently. it seems as though its making a comeback. i have only heard it this year, but i have heard the rumor of the all cultures day incedent. however i've heard another rumor of a prank phone call a few years ago. has anyone else heard this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.1.88 (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

didn't he, that one time, with the pudding... —Preceding unsigned comment added by KSI jew bagel (talk • contribs) 03:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think its hilarious that everyone calls him Dr. Pudding now. some people even call him "Doc Pud" for short. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.1.88 (talk) 03:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard more another version of the "All cultures day" incident. The pudding consuming story might still also be true but I heard that there was a smaller food fight with the main weapon being Pudding. Dr.P stopped the fight and earned the name Dr. Pudding. --68.165.198.65 (talk) 01:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Pudding as a nickname for bud jenkins is as much part of the school as anything else on the page. stop trying to take it down —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.251.108 (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To put a rest on all the Dr. Pudding rumors... The all cultures day incedent DID occur, but that is not the reason why that is his nickname. a few years ago some students were planning a prank on Bud Jenkins (i forget what the prank was, but i'm pretty sure it fizzled out, or they got cold feet) the code name for Bud was "dr. Pudding" so a few students from the class of 07 started it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.97.202.76 (talk) 17:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extra Curriculars

so are preforming arts, student worker and model UN the only important sections now? i don't think any clubs sections should be taken down —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.251.108 (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Can someone add this to the article? --DrBat 11:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you? Wikidudeman ^(talk) 17:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though this is old news, I have added another source for related statements. Also, newhounds is biased and is probably not the best source to use. 24.8.147.178 (talk) 02:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

theater

i removing some of the outdated stuff, like upcoming shows from last year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.97.202.76 (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism repair

A lot of vandalism still remains on this page. I am about to correct the "varsity sports" portion -- someone else will have to check on the intramural and club sports.Paul (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Boulder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Boulder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Boulder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.chsaa.org/about/pdf/champions.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boulder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071022001332/http://www.bvsdwatch.org/content/view/91/1/ to http://www.bvsdwatch.org/content/view/91/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are state championships and national poll rankings encyclopedic?

In this edit, John from Idegon claims that state championships should be removed and that "National high school polls are op/ed, not fact". The material in question that has been removed improperly is as follows:

1) "Boulder High earned their second Boys Soccer 5A State Championship in 2016 with a win over Broomfield High School and a perfect 20-0 season." This is supported by this source

2) "The 2016 Panthers finished the season ranked second in the nation by USA Today on its Super 25 Expert Rankings.", whcih was backed by this source from USA Today.

I'm not sure that John from Idegon understands policy here, but I invite any comment that would demonstrate consensus that a state champions or a ranking in a national poll cannot be included in any article, even with a reliable and verifiable source. Alansohn (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The state championship can and should be included in the article. But I stand on the national polls being nothing but hoo haa. Unlike college, there is no basis for comparing high school teams from different regions to each other. They are nothing but the poll compiler's opinion and as such are op/ed, not journalistic reporting. At work now will expand later. John from Idegon (talk) 20:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more that "The state championship can and should be included in the article.", but you removed it twice. That double removal of what you acknowledge to be encyclopedic undermines the entire claim, but I'm willing to discuss further.

I wouldn't be interested in your rankings of high school boys soccer teams, or of mine, but the USA Today rankings are from a panel of experts at a reliable and verifiable source, supporting a strong claim of accomplishment at the national level. I'd reconsider if you can point to Wikipedia's "no hoo haa" policy, but the source stands on its own. Alansohn (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boulder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni tag

The Alumni section seems pretty tight, I spot checked a few entries, but it was tagged by TheGEICOgecko on 22 June 2022 as needing attention. What needs to be done here? ~Kvng (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be provided that they are both notable and alumni. The fact that all alumni have Wikipedia articles is enough to prove notability. However, there also must be a reliable source provided for each alumni showing they are from that school, of which their Wikipedia article is not enough to show this. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you identify specific entries where you could not verify they are alumni. I did find evidence in the ones I spot checked either as a source in this article or in the linked article. ~Kvng (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]