Jump to content

Talk:Botswana Defence Force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice edit JackyR! Guinnog 20:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Louis-Fisher

[edit]

The ISS (and overseas docs which might have used this as their source) give Louis-Fisher's first name and title as: Major General Matshenwenyego. However, Mmegi, the Botswana Sun and other Botswana newspapers give Lieutenant General Matshenyego. I'm inclined to believe the latter. JackyR 17:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even the Bots gov sources give the latter. Egs: Gov, Mmegi, ISS book launch JackyR 17:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme Lists

[edit]

A list of equipment does not cite anything, and it looks like a wishlist.

Sir Jazer 13 (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does look like a wish list. Been trying to follow it and it does not make sense, Tempest II (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Incorrect information?

[edit]

"Being a landlocked country, Botswana has no navy but has acquired a piece of land by the Namibian coastline which will be used to build a world class navy. With a new uranium mine opening in two years time in northern part of Botswana, it is not yet clear if the country will try to acquire a nuclear bomb." This sounds hard to believe- but then I know nothing about Botswana. Can anyone confirm if this is correct?

94.169.99.158 (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Botswana Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Botswana Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tables of equipment

[edit]

Some tables of equipment have been removed by other editors, I think because they have been moved elsewhere. They should not be reinstated here via edit warring. If anybody feels that they should be restored here, please engage in this discussion to seek consensus first. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no need to crowd up the article with duplicate tables located on a separate page. - FOX 52 (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who moved them where and why? Why not make us aware of it in any case because the first person to do so (talk) said was "was clearing a mess" the table is not overcrowding the article in any where, I made the table with sources I had and referenced and some people would add more that was not my doing perhaps if you feel it was too long, I have you have seen the Nigerian Army & Rwanda Defence Force who used my template you would understand why, other than going to each other User Talk to notify one another to gang up against the table. I think the table should be restored — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.167.79.68 (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
First, thank you for coming here, I hope we can now make some progress together. The aircraft are listed at Botswana Defence Force Air Wing. I do not know about the other equipment; @FOX 52:, can you enlighten us? Per WP:OTHER, how other pages deal with it is not directly relevant. Rather, since they copied the IP's model they may benefit from a review too. It may be we should post invitations to this discussion on their talk pages, but I'd suggest we get a clearer idea of the issues here first. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because this is an overview of the BDF, the page should give the reader a general description of the specific branches without over inundating them with too many details – That should be reserved for the specific branch services Air Force, Navy…etc. Then you can lay into the tables and such. IMHO - FOX 52 (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMAGES ADDITION

[edit]

FOX 52 has been reverting my edits claiming "the article is overloaded"with images & as such has made himself the gate keeper with the final say whereas this article on contrary has only 2 images & the images inserted are within a very small multiple image table — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.167.79.78 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

follow this rules Wikipedia:Image dos and don'ts. 47.152.62.185 (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of the image cluster the CF-5 fighter is low quality, the Gulfstream appears to be operated by the government, & not the BDF, and the "Outgoing Botswana Defense Force Commander" is too vague. - leaving the Botswana Special Forces which is a good picture. - FOX 52 (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the Gulfstream is registered & operated by BDF Air Arm, its public knowledge & i tell you this as a member of the BDF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.167.79.78 (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://online.bdf.org.bw/about. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 18:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I added a picture gallery few days back that has been reverted, it would be helpful in most cases to give us the reason/s as to why some of this new additions are entirely removed or atleast tell us what could be improved or ommitted as I believe it doesnt hurt for the article to be improved and updated from time to time

Protection

[edit]

Hello, this article was been infested by vandalism several times today, which was reverted by Cysquatch and TryAgainSooner. I'm requesting this article for semi-protection, but I accidentally requested it for full protection, so I'll fix the problem. Sparkbean (talk) 17:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Botswana_Defence_Force&oldid=1246066040"