Talk:Book of Nathan the Prophet

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Texts Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About Stub

This is listed as a stub article. Realistically, what more is there to say about the topic? It is a lost book and the only description we have of its contents is already in the article. Because many people don't know which books are considered part of "the Bible", I think this article should be kept. But the stub designation probably should be removed. RickReinckens 23:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect?

I think that Nathan the Prophet should redirect to Nathan (Prophet) instead of here. It seems to make more sense to me, but then again I'm not a Christian. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? JSmith60 03:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. -Kerplunk- 21:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can definitely have an opinion on a faith you don't believe, much like you can have an opinion on Star Wars or Harry Potter - as long as it's NPOV. OneWeirdDude (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]