Talk:Bluetooth/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 14:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see two other people have made similar comments, so I'l just call a spade and spade and fail the nomination as the article is not close to meeting the criteria. First of all, large parts of the article are unreferenced: pretty much everything in the article needs to have an in-line citation to reach GA (criterion 2). I've lost count of the number of [citation needed] tags—none of which are accepted in a GA. Secondly, the article is a mess. Large parts of the article is written as bullet-points instead of as proper prose; there are far too many sections, many of which are too short to be sections (criterion 1a). I find the layout of information confusing and I cannot see an internal logic as of what information is where, and there also seems to be some duplication of information. The information on the development and the ownership of the technology is too short (criterion 3b). Information on the technical aspects is not presented in an orderly way. I hope this feedback can help make the article better, but it probably needs to be significantly rewritten before attempting GAN again. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]