Talk:Blue Shift (short story)

Novels: Short story / Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is the book by Stephen Baxter the main entry? I would think that this should go to either the Blue shift (light refraction) page or to the whole disambiguation list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tekrex (talk • contribs) 20:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue shift (lower case s) and Blue Shift (upper case S), and they both provide access to Blue shift (disambiguation), so where's the harm?--Hraefen ^Talk 21:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's neither here nor there that they both give access to the page - I'm also a bit uncertain about why Blue Shift (capitals) should go to the Stephen Baxter book, rather than, say, the video game. I think that a disambiguation page would be a less confusing way for this to go. 81.179.100.150 13:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can fight it out with someone who has strong feeling about which is more deserving of the namespace (isn't that the gist of yur argument?): I certainly don't. I just know that regardless of which topic has it, the other one is just two clicks and about 4 seconds away, so I think fretting over it is not productive and really only niche fans are gonna care either way. But pursue it if you think it actually matters.--Hraefen ^Talk 22:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]