Talk:Blue Gardenia (album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:33, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref 10: August not Aug; Ref 11: p. instead of pp.

Done. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Cedar Walton Dachau 2001.JPG is a little bit noisy. You can ask someone on WP:LAB to retouch it. But that is not so important.

Done. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• I'll promote it. Good job!--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 15:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Great! Thanks so much! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.