Talk:Bloodwork (Texas in July album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Requested move 22 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus, leaning towards not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodwork (Texas in July album) → Bloodwork (album) – Shorter and currently redirects to an EP of the same title; the 2 articles should be connected by hatnotes instead. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC) --MASHAUNIX 23:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support move - I concur with this move. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the "(album)" redirect should point to the disambiguation page where both the EP and this album would be listed. The EP itself used to reside at the "album" location until yesterday [1], when you moved it; so it shows that the community considers EPs as a type of album, thus the album location is ambiguous. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment your failure to fix the file page [2] when you renamed the article is disappointing; if this move had gone through without the fix, there would be a big problem with the file facing deletion. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry about this. Either way, the "community" should come to a decision now. IMO a dab page is also fine but not needed, since a hatnote in both articles will do the same job more easily. There are many pairs of studio album/EP articles on WP with the same title that are treated this way.--MASHAUNIX 05:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - I agree that a hatnote will do the same job more easily. --Jax 0677 (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mashaunix User:Jax 0677 please see below. The other album has been restored. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose long EPs are usually short albums and whether the name of the band is hidden on the competing EP or not (hiding it is daft IMHO), the band name must be shown per WP:Naming conventions (music). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is 24 min:35 long and has been at (album) from 2008 till yesterday I have put (album) back, but of course this new claimant means it now has to be at Bloodwork (Wednesday 13 album). Additionally both of these albums are badly sourced and borderline notability. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.