Talk:BizX

This page was proposed for deletion by David Gerard (talk · contribs) on 11 June 2019.

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please expand this article from these sources

There are sources to help expand this article. For instance:

BizXchange - Google News Search
BizXchange - Google Books Search
BizXchange - Google Scholar
"Automotive industries interview with Edward Fitzgerald, founder of the BizXchange". (please expand the citation)
bizxchange -site:wikipedia.org - Bing News

Peaceray (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct name format? Also, advert?

Is it BizX or BIZX? I see both in search results.
The article, or part of it, seems like an {{advert}}.

Zeniff (talk) 04:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BizX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140713005551/http://www.dubaisme100.ae/en/Pages/Top100.aspx to http://www.dubaisme100.ae/en/Pages/Top100.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Literally not a single RS

This article presently has literally zero RSes. Thalia42 notes that they own Slashdot and SourceForge - so if we can find literally zero evidence for BizX themselves passing WP:NCORP, should they be redirected to their notable subsidiary? Thalia42, can you find any sources on BizX that pass RS muster? - David Gerard (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added citations from Forbes & LATimes & a thesis. I have no attachment to the article, just wandered here from Slashdot. --Thalia42 (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support merging and redirecting this article to Slashdot or SourceForge, to comply with WP:INHERITORG guideline. The citations from Thalia42 can be merged into that article. If we later collect enough references, we could unmerge/split and revert back to this article at that time. --DavidCary (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]