Talk:Bishop International Airport attack/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Bishop International Airport attack. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Notable?
This is starting to become routine news, x tries out an attack, x fails at doing any major harm. Had this been even a well known criminal stabbing this officer there would be no article. This again has me saying that we really need to decide which of these attacks are encyclopedic and will be remembered. Are we going to make an article about the woman who shouts "Allahu akbar " while whacking an officer with her purse next? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps the disruption caused by these events in city centres, airports, train stations etc. makes them notable enough for articles? Jim Michael (talk) 23:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- I would not call that a WP:LASTING impact but your rationale is definitely an improvement over "it's a terrorist attack so it's notable" comments I see at AfDs. I just wonder why these types of attacks in North America and Europe are always the subjects of articles but incidents of equal or greater magnitude in Asia or Africa are less covered by editors.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- They often lead to an increase in security measures at high-risk locations such as airports and public buildings.
- It's because the vast majority of readers and editors of English WP are from North America and Europe - and because the media in the West love to sensationalise such events. Jim Michael (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Of course it is a notable incident: a terrorist arrived in the U.S. from a country usually considered friendly. WRT to your concern about «incidents of equal or greater magnitude in Asia or Africa are less covered by editors», it seems to me it might me more useful for Wikipedia if people with your sort of concern were to write such articles instead of complaining about the hard work of people who write important articles such as this one about the terrorist attack at the Michigan airport. XavierItzm (talk) 03:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Since it's the only incident at this airport notable enough for an article, I've just renamed it accordingly. Hope that's OK. No sources call it either title, if that still matters in deciding a common name. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- I would not call that a WP:LASTING impact but your rationale is definitely an improvement over "it's a terrorist attack so it's notable" comments I see at AfDs. I just wonder why these types of attacks in North America and Europe are always the subjects of articles but incidents of equal or greater magnitude in Asia or Africa are less covered by editors.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 15 November 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Bishop International Airport incident → Bishop International Airport attack – The suspected attacker was recently found guilty. The current title is ambiguous, since this airport has had multiple incidents. FallingGravity 19:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call three incidents "multiple" but attack would be a better name I suppose. TomCat4680 (talk) 20:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.