Jump to content

Talk:Bipartite dimension

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Connection to set basis problem

[edit]

I'm confused as how the set basis problem fits in here. I see how the collection of sets can be viewed as a bipartite graph, but it's not clear that when you translate the problem to this view you get anything relating to bipartite dimension. --RDBury (talk) 05:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the set basis problem, we are given a collection C of sets over a universe of elements, and the problem is to determine a family F of sets such that every set in C can be expressed as a union of sets in F. C can be interpreted as a bipartite graph with sets on one side and elements on the other. Every set S in a family F of sets corresponds to a biclique that has the elements of S on the element side and the sets in C that are subsets of S on the set side. F is a set basis if and only if these bicliques cover the bipartite graph determined by C.
By the way, re your recent tagging of the article as lacking inline sources: see Please see WP:HARV. The article does in fact have many inline citations, in an approved style for Wikipedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bipartite dimension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]