Talk:Biophilia (album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biophilia (album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Björk (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Björk, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BjörkWikipedia:WikiProject BjörkTemplate:WikiProject BjörkBjörk

Electronic music High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Additional sources:

http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2011/03/bjork-gorillazs-damon-albarn-at-manchester-interna.html
http://pitchfork.com/news/41906-bjork-announces-string-of-uk-shows/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/mar/17/manchester-international-festival
http://www.dazeddigital.com/music/article/10006/1/bj%C3%B6rk-unveils-live-residency
http://pitchfork.com/news/41098-bjork-makes-new-music-for-solar-system-ipad-app/ (re: "Solar System" app)
http://www.touchpress.com/press/SolarSystem_iPad_Release.pdf (PDF, re: Touch Press press release for "Solar System" app)
http://pitchfork.com/news/40844-bjork-talks-about-icelandic-energy-controversy/ ("Björk Talks About Icelandic Energy Controversy")
http://pitchfork.com/news/38202-bjork-and-michel-gondry-working-on-scientific-musical/ ("Björk and Michel Gondry Working on "Scientific Musical")
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/story/2011/08/05/f-bjork-app-album.html

Feel free to add more! --Another Believer _(Talk) 01:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singles

From my point of view, the singles 'Cosmogony', 'Virus' and 'Moon' are not full single releases, but a promo release accompanying the iTunes apps, that's why I see they shouldn't be placed in the infobox's singles space. Anyway, I've placed them in a new space for 'digital singles' but I believe they should not be placed anywhere because all the songs on Biophilia will be released as promo singles, and further, some of them will have full (true) single releases (see 'Crystalline'). --83.58.205.56 (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, all album tracks will be released as promo singles but only a few will get actual single treatment with video's etc so i don't think all tracks should be listed as singles. --Duphin (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, finally, no more app-singles will be released, (we don't know whether there will be more tradicional singles or not...) but according to Björk.com, 'Cosmogony', 'Virus' and 'Moon' are singles. Do you think articles should be created for 'Cosmogony' and 'Virus' since 'Moon' already has one? --Quaveren (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NYT Critic’s Notebook

Playing the New Bjork Album, and Playing Along, With Apps by Seth Schiesel, published October 24, 2011 in The New York Times. 99.112.215.159 (talk) 01:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Distributor

Article says, that the distributors are One Little Indian and Polydor Records. But as of now I saw only One Little Indian and Nonesuch Records, see for example [1]. What is correct now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndg2 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the release history: One Little Indian/Polydor are for the UK, while Nonesuch is for the US and Canada. Snap Snap 16:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but Nonesuch Records should then be mentioned in the "label" section too, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndg2 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the "label" field in the album infobox? Per Template:Infobox album#Label, only the primary label should be specified in the infobox, which is One Little Indian/Polydor in this case. Snap Snap 18:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source 5

The link for source (5) is broken. Please add source. 2601:19B:C700:C0:0:0:0:A27C (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]