Talk:BioScience
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BioScience article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.aibs.org/bioscience. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006041410012826. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Untitled
[edit]This article should be renammed "Biosciences (Journal)", to avoid the confusion of the subject -a journal- with the term 'Bioscience(s)' that is more generally accepted in the scientific and technical community, to design collective sciences related to Biology (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Biosciences redirects Biology page). See Biosciences (disambiguation). Eboireau (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
This article is written in a way in which it state facts that can't be verified by sources, often because of the lack of possibility to quantify the statement. Examples: "...heavily cited...", "...BioScience has published timely and authoritative overviews..." and "...professionally written...". The whole article is now more a subjective description of the content rather than information about the journal it self. Zaijaj (talk) 11:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)