Talk:BeyondTrust

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BeyondTrust article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Microsoft's acquisition of DesktopStandard

DesktopStandard Transition and Support page at M$ Technet says that M$ acquired DesktopStandard in 2006. Is that the same DesktopStandard as the one mentioned in this article? If yes, how could Symark acquire it in 2009?

DesktopStandard article redirects to Group Policy. If both aforementioned firms are the same thing, it should probably be redirected here. — Vano 05:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know this 'M$' you speak of. Did you mean Microsoft? And yes, you're right: if they are the same company, it should be redirected here. --DanielPharos (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BeyondTrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200938/4425/Symark-and-BeyondTrust-
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109174244/http://www.itjungle.com/two/two052808-story09.html to http://www.itjungle.com/two/two052808-story09.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607073726/http://www.itworld.com/beyondtrust to http://www.itworld.com/beyondtrust

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article requires updating

Looking into things, it appears that the current BeyondTrust is not the former Symark, but the former Bomgar. Bomgar purchased BeyondTrust and changed its corporate name. The article (including the infobox) needs to reflect this, just as AT&T refers to the current company, not the historic one whose name it took. I don't think any of the companies that Bomgar purchased to form the current BeyondTrust are noteworthy enough for their own articles, but it is clear that this one is not reflecting reality.128.151.71.11 (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]