Talk:Bernstein's Bagels/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 02:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 11:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello again! I'll take a look and review this GA nomination! --Vacant0 (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 18% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable. You've created the article 2 days ago and so far you're the only contributor.
• No previous GA reviews.

General comments

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • No problems were found in the lede.
  • The rest of the article is okay. I could not find any grammatical issues or weird sentences.
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Alt texts are present in the article. Good job.
  • The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
  • I do have a recommendation for the lede, though. What about a short sentence on what they offer (from the Description section) in the shop?
    • Added "Bernstein's serves bagels with schmears and sides like eggs, lox, and prosciutto, as well as bagel sandwiches, coffee, and tea." ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
• Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
  • No referencing issues.
  • Listed references are reliable, all are news websites. References have been archived.
    • Address is not referenced in the infobox. I've noticed a few references mention this address, such as Ref 5, so add it either to the infobox or as a new sentence in the text.
      •  Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 5 7, 9, 10, 18, 20–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • The St. Johns location closed – Do we know when?
    • Not yet! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The article stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring since the creation of the article.
• Checking images.
  • All looks good, the logo has been uploaded under a non-free licence while the image is under GFDL.

Final comments

@Another Believer: There are a couple of things to fix, but other than that, the article is in a good shape. I will put the nomination on hold for a week. Once the issues get addressed, I'll promote the article. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I think I have addressed your concerns, but please let me know if any remain. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Looks good now. Promoting. Vacant0 (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.