Talk:Beecher's Handmade Cheese/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Seattle, Washington, United States (don't forget to mention the country). 500,000 pounds need converting to metric (use {{convert}}). The two sentences concerning macaroni and cheese should avoid being wikilinked twice (and preferably rewritten to not repeat "macaroni and cheese" so close to each other). Include the last stray sentence on macaroni and cheese in the rest of the paragraph, and preferably include it in the lead. In the infobox, "type" is designed for type of entity (private company, public company, cooperative etc), not industry, that has its own line. The entity name (inc., ltd. etc) should be included in the infobox title (unless the company doesn't have one of course). And get rid of that stub template at the bottom—the article is not a stub.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Ref 2 is dead; ref 3 links wrong (the same as ref 1).
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A few small things that need fixing, so I am putting on hold. Whence fixed, it will pass without problems. Arsenikk (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks! I'll just need a day or two. rootology (C)(T) 17:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I think I've got all your concerns addressed now. How does it look? I searched around as well, for a proper entity name. They don't appear to have one. rootology (C)(T) 19:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Great. This is now a good article; congratulations! Arsenikk (talk) 22:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you! :) rootology (C)(T) 22:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)