Jump to content

Talk:Bedminster railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBedminster railway station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that westbound trains can arrive unexpectedly on the eastbound track at Bedminster railway station to ease congestion at nearby Bristol Temple Meads?

Butt - is it accurate?

[edit]

Is Butt's book the only one that claims that Bedminster station was orginally called Ashton? MacDermott, the Avon County stations gazetteer, and Oakley make no mention of this? Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OS first edition map confirms that station was closer to Temple Meads when surveyed at some point in 1881-3, but gives name as 'Bedminster station'. See http://maps.bristol.gov.uk/knowyourplace . Suggests that if it was ever called Ashton station, it was renamed then moved, rather than "moved and then renamed" as the article currently has it. But personally it seems unlikely to me that it was ever called Ashton station, given that Ashton is further from Temple Meads and Bedminster is a very old name for this area. Qwfp (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to Butt, there have been two stations named Bedminster. The present one was always so named, and opened in 1932. See also discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Long Ashton railway station. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedminster mural 0.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Bedminster mural 0.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bedminster mural 0.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedminster mural 1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Bedminster mural 1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bedminster mural 1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedminster mural 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Bedminster mural 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bedminster mural 2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedminster mural 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Bedminster mural 3.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bedminster mural 3.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bedminster railway station

[edit]

Yes, I know it's tedious, but WP:RS does seem to rule out using 'wiki' like systems as a source, even when it's OpenStreetMap (whose reliability is often BETTER than other mapping providers).

I think you should bring the issue of OpenStreetMap's reliability up, as whilst within the letter of the policy, replacing OSM with OS seems to be not within the intent of WP:RS. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not willing to involve myself in en.wp bureaucracy to that level. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I noted your edit summary "sigh, OS map then, which no one can actually see. stupid RS". Actually, OS maps are highly visible, since the 1:50000 and 1:25000 layers on Streetmap.co.uk are the OS maps, and the OS Getamap site also shows maps at these scales. Bob1960evens (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bedminster railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bedminster railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bedminster railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bedminster_railway_station&oldid=1218569360"