Talk:Bedford Free School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bedfordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

The article as it stands strikes me as rather one sided in favour of the school and contains no reference to real criticism. I considered tagging as a COI as well, particularly as the two major contributors haven't edited really outside of this article. Certainly there's a need for citing specific POV issues and, probably, inserting some kind of balance into the article. I'll see what I can find, but it'd be lovely if people with access to local press archives could do so as well. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to address this by updating the article, and adding the council's reasons for refusing planning permission. It still needs work though. Bleaney (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I can't really see anything wrong with the neutrality of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.241.9 (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reordered the article, added recent information about the schools ofsted inspection, and added a section to the lead that explains the controversy surrounding the school. I have removed the POV template as I now think the article reflects the 'for' and 'against' arguments more fairly, however please feel free to readd the template if you think its not the case. - Bleaney (talk) 13:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bedford Free School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426011857/http://www.bedfordfreeschool.co.uk/pdf/bedford-free-school-guide.pdf to http://www.bedfordfreeschool.co.uk/pdf/bedford-free-school-guide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]