Talk:Bedford–Northampton line
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Bedford to Northampton Line. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bedford to Northampton Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202075722/http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/ld-northampton-decn.pdf to http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/ld-northampton-decn.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rpws.co.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/bon2007.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214085453/http://cmis.milton-keynes.gov.uk/CmisWebPublic/Binary.ashx?Document=2600 to http://cmis.milton-keynes.gov.uk/CmisWebPublic/Binary.ashx?Document=2600
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306172043/http://www.brta-bedford.org.uk/Newsletter_43.pdf to http://www.brta-bedford.org.uk/Newsletter_43.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/ld-brackmills-notice.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bedford–Northampton line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150111233809/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/long-term-planning-process/improving-connectivity.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/long-term-planning-process/improving-connectivity.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140125203647/http://www.brta-bedford.org.uk/html/bon-brackmills.html to http://www.brta-bedford.org.uk/html/bon-brackmills.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Newton Blossomville halt
[edit]Is there a better source than http://www.turveybeds.com/railways.html for a halt at Newton Blosonville? A geocaching site says that it is listed in the 1958 timetable. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @JMF: There's no entry in Butt (1995), and nothing in the relevant Middleton Press book - Bedford to Wellingborough including Hitchin, Northampton and Higham Ferrers. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- interesting... I deleted a quite detailed assertion from Newton Blossomville because it wasn't cited, not on our line template and not shown on the 1882 25" OS. But "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", so it seemed only fair to phone a friend. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's odd, because looking at maps, Newton Blossomville would be a suitable place for a halt - the settlement is much closer to the railway than Turvey is to its eponymous station. But I see no station (or halt) marked on old OS maps. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I wondered it it might be an early morning milk pickup only, and I see an "interesting" field boundary pattern on the modern 1:25,000 OS map [via Streetmap.co.uk] at the suggested location (SP9264351177) Intriguing... --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC) The 1952 6" map only has a little wobble there, nothing remarkable. The modern Google aerial imaging (at 52.151049, -0.647121) shows a marginally anomalous clearing. Curiouser and curiouser. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's odd, because looking at maps, Newton Blossomville would be a suitable place for a halt - the settlement is much closer to the railway than Turvey is to its eponymous station. But I see no station (or halt) marked on old OS maps. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- interesting... I deleted a quite detailed assertion from Newton Blossomville because it wasn't cited, not on our line template and not shown on the 1882 25" OS. But "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", so it seemed only fair to phone a friend. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)