Jump to content

Talk:Beaney House of Art and Knowledge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Success? Reception?

[edit]

The article quotes: Together with the associated project to redevelop the Marlowe Theatre site, the Beaney's 2009-2012 refurbishment was intended to "transform that part of the city centre into a vibrant cultural quarter" - well, I would be interested: Was this goal achieved? Is that part of the city centre now a "vibrant cultural quarter", or appears to be on the way there? How was the general reception of the refurbishment after completion? That's something currently missing here. There is a short sentence hinting at some controversy, "The project attracted some controversy" - however, this is sourced with a link from 2009 which is now dead. I visited the Beaney this June and personally found the museum part nice, but was less impressed with the library which seemed not very spacious and a bit confusing. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Writing a Wiki article is about relating what is in the sources, and not about inputting our own opinions. I remember the Beaney from the late 1960s when it was still just as originally designed. The two front rooms were mahogany (or oak?) -lined reading rooms - beautifully elegant, atmospheric and peaceful. All the daily and weekly papers and magazines were there, and anybody could just come in and sit quietly to read them. People could read book after book there and educate themselves, when the library had not yet been cleared out of "excessive", overly-serious and non-popular books, i.e. text books of all kinds. It was a paradise for those who could not attend college or university. But as I said, Wikipedia is no place for opinion, and sources don't always say what we agree with. Whoever put your quotation in there was only interpreting the source. The library has now been transformed into a place which is not worth spending much time in - useful for the superficiality of tourism, I guess. But WP must use official or authoritative sources, and such sources won't get nostalgic about serious self-education (the reason why the Beaney was built), will they. I agree with your cynicism, but that sort of source is all you're going to get for modern makeovers of UK libraries. --Storye book (talk) 19:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Writing a Wiki article is about relating what is in the sources, and not about inputting our own opinions" - that's of course very true. So, I meant additions using reliable sources regarding the public reception of the refurbishment after completion. Surely there must be some, positive or negative? Yes, I'm skeptical (sadly, I didn't know the old Beaney - I'm from Switzerland and visited it for the first time this year on an educational trip visiting several libraries in the UK), but I would welcome any well-sourced additions to the article that make a bit more clear how the result is perceived by the public and e.g. newspapers. People living there are certainly more likely to find usable sources than me... Newspaper reports would be an option, certainly not the most authoritative sources, but generally accepted for recent events. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Beaney House of Art and Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Beaney House of Art and Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Beaney" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Beaney has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 30 § Beaney until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.249 (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beaney_House_of_Art_and_Knowledge&oldid=1206206305"