Talk:Beacon Hill (train)

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Regional services

Amtrak regional trains along the same corridor provided limited intercity service.

This is really nitpicky (and let me emphasize I'm impressed at how big this article has become), but I'm not comfortable referring to 1970s and 1980s era Northeast Corridor trains as "regionals," capitalized or no. It's a great shorthand now but it grew out of the short-lived Acela Regional branding which started around 2000 or so. While I'm nitpicking, service between Boston and Providence wasn't "limited," unless we're using that word in the sense "making few stops." I'm trying to come up with a better sentence. Mackensen (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was wondering how to word both those things. Nitpick and edit away. I would like to continue linking the regional trains, however we label them, to Northeast Regional, since the NR is exactly the same as those old named services. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]